Introduction

On June 1967, Israel was responsible for slaughtering 34 Americans and wounding nearly 200 more in a sustained attack on a U.S. reconnaissance ship, the USS Liberty. Israel claimed that they thought it was all a case of mistaken identity, that they were under the impression that it was an Egyptian ship. That confusion amidst the fog of war led to the tragedy.

The survivors didn’t buy this tall tale. Neither did the Secretary of State, the director of the CIA, or various other high level government officials. Despite all of this, an investigation ordered by LBJ sided with the Israelis side of the story and the cover up began.

The Attack

But just a brief look at the stories of the survivors show that this was no case of mistaken identity. The Liberty was an unmistakable ship, with a number of large communication antennas decorating its exterior. The Israelis deployed what survivors recall as unmarked jets and torpedo boats against the Liberty. The Israelis jammed communications. Machine guns, rockets, torpedoes, and napalm were used against the American vessel by waves of jets and a flotilla of torpedo boats which machine gunned life rafts.

The Liberty was proudly flying an American flag, with its hull markings written in English on its side. When the first flag was destroyed, the people aboard the Liberty housed up another.

With all of this being said, there are many that think that this was no case of mistaken identity, that this was rather a false flag attack meant to bring America into the Six Day War on the side of Israel.

Interview Context

Now, my opinions on the matter are most likely clear, given the intro of this video and the other content on my channel, but my opinion on the matter is not of that much importance. However, almost ten years ago, I had the opportunity to talk with someone whose opinion is of great significance and of major historical importance. That man is former U.S. Marine Corps Staff Sergeant Bryce Lockwood: a Russian linguist and intelligence specialist, and one of the last surviving members of the USS Liberty incident.

I was only 16 years old at the time of this recording, so forgive the hair helmet. And I also ask that you forgive any issues with the audio quality or the video quality. There are definitely some minor issues with background noise in the video, because when I had the opportunity to talk with Sergeant Bryce Lockwood, it was before a speaking engagement of his, and there were people slowly filtering into the space while I was conducting the interview.

But with the genocide going on in Gaza and the current stranglehold that the Israel lobby has on American foreign policy, I thought that I should reshare this interview that I conducted with Sergeant Bryce Lockwood. If for nothing else, just for posterity sake.

Why did I feel the need to share this interview? Because if there was ever a time for us all to remember and grapple with the lessons to be learned from the USS Liberty incident, is now.

My name is Luke Marshall. You’re watching Sigh Ops, and this is my interview with Sergeant Bryce Lockwood.

Interview with Sergeant Bryce Lockwood

Luke: Today I’m going to be talking with Sergeant Bryce Lockwood, who was one of only three Marines on the USS Liberty, and he’s the only surviving marine. Isn’t that correct?

Sgt. Lockwood: That’s correct.

Luke: And I’m very excited to talk with him. I think the USS Liberty is a very important subject, and I don’t think it gets as much attention as it deserves. And the first thing that I want to ask you is, why do you think Israel, America’s alleged ally, would attack the USS Liberty?

Sgt. Lockwood: That’s a very good question that we would like the answer to. For instance, during the attack, the Israelis were using unmarked aircraft. That’s a violation of international law. We did not know who was attacking us.

When we were finally able to get a May day off, and it was acknowledged by six fleet, which was some 350 nautical miles away or 400 nautical miles away, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara intervened and requested that the aircraft that were sent to our aid be returned. There had been a nuclear drill, and some of those aircraft had nuclear weapons aboard them.

Captain Joseph Tolley, who was skipper of the carrier USS Saratoga, figured that it was probably because of those nuclear weapons he ordered. The aircraft recovered, the weapons replaced with conventional armaments, relaunched and reunified Washington, and again Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered them, recalled the commander of Task Force six, who was Admiral Larry Geiss, said, we have an American ship which is under fire.

I want to hear that from higher authority. LBJ came on the wire and said, get those aircraft back. I will not have my allies embarrassed. Which raises the question: we did not know who was attacking us—how did LBJ know? Very sinister question.

Luke: Very sinister question. Yes. And I saw you actually mentioned that in the Al Jazeera documentary The Day Israel Attacked America. When you were on there. And that was actually something I was going to ask you about, is what role do you think that American officials such as LBJ and Robert McNamara played in the attack on the Liberty? Were they just part of the cover up, or were they also part in planning the attack?

Sgt. Lockwood: It’s my personal opinion that they could have been part of the planning of the attack. America’s entire nuclear force was on full alert that morning of June the 8th, 1967, long before we were attacked, which is one of the reasons why there were nuclear weapons aboard those aircraft that were launched to come to our aid. And that raises the question why?

We do know that LBJ had a personal vendetta against the Egyptian president.

Luke: Nasser.

Sgt. Lockwood:Yeah. Abdel Nasser. That’s correct. Yeah. And literally hated the man. So that raises a question. Was this part of an agreement between Israel to initiate warfare, have an American ship set up as a puppet to be destroyed? Blame it on the United Arab Republic, of which Egypt was the major contributing military force, and then use that as an excuse for nuclear war?

Luke: Yes. And that’s actually something I was wanting to ask you about. A lot of people believe that the reason the Liberty was attacked was meant to be a false flag attack, where the United Arab Republic would be blamed for the attack, and this would serve as a pretext for the United States to participate in the Six-Day War on the side of Israel.

Sgt. Lockwood: There are a lot of people that have that opinion. It all may have been very innocent, but it seems to me that the evidence is pretty strong, that there was collusion, at least on the part of President Johnson with the Israeli government. And that’s one of the main reasons why, some nearly 50 years later, now, no one in government will talk about it.

I have met congressmen say, yes, I’m fully aware of that. Are you going to conduct an investigation which is required by article one, section eight, United States Constitution? That is probably not going to take place. And that raises another question. Why is it that we elect people to represent us? They swear to pull the Constitution, but they pick and choose which articles they want to abide by and which ones they ignore.

Luke: That’s a very great point, and I actually was curious to know. I have heard that a lot of the Liberty survivors, that they were actually threatened with being court martialed and so on, if they were to speak out about what happened on the Liberty and their personal experience, were you personally told to keep quiet?

Sgt. Lockwood: My situation was a little unique. I was assigned to temporary duty aboard the ship. My home base was in Bremerhaven, Germany, and I had been on a separate mission with VQ two, U.S. Naval Airborne Intelligence Collection outfit from Rota, Spain. And that mission had completed and I was back at Rota, Spain awaiting to go back to my base in Bremerhaven when I received orders to go aboard the Liberty, and this was immediately prior to the opening warfare, the Six Days War.

The morning after the attack, I was medevaced to the carrier America. I had some pretty severe wounds result of flash burns, and the fear was for infection. So I was medevaced off to the carrier Mark. I was aboard her for ten days and then sent to rejoin the Liberty, which was at that point in drydock in the. Luca, Malta. I was aboard her that night, and then the next afternoon received orders to return to my home base. So I was never ordered specifically never to talk about it. In fact, when I was in the confines of our secure spaces with the intelligence …. that I worked with in Bremerhaven, I spoke quite freely about it. The Navy sent a lieutenant commander, JAG officer, judge advocate, general officer all the way from the states with some documents for me to sign, and they appeared to me to just be the same documents that periodically you had to sign when you were in intelligence work, that you were going to keep your zipped, not talk about the work that you did. And there was nothing specific in there about not talking about the Liberty. So I discussed it quite freely within the confines of the secure spaces, did not discuss it with family or friends outside of the secure spaces. But as for specifically saying don’t ever talk about it, I was not given that specific statement.

Luke: And have you faced any repercussions for talking about this? Have you been maligned in any way?

Sgt. Lockwood: You know, when you when you’re in the public eye, you’re going to have people that disagree with you and some of them quite strongly, but not from the government. I have never had anyone come knock on my door and say, you’re going to jail. James Ennis James Jr, that wrote the book Assault on the Liberty—that book was published, I believe, in 1980. I think that’s correct. And Mr. Ennis was asked this. ‘Has anyone threatened you?’ And he said those same words. I have never had anyone come knock on my door and personally threaten me or take me away to jail.

Luke: Well, that’s very interesting. When you were brought aboard the Malta, isn’t that what?

Sgt. Lockwood: Yes.

Luke: Okay. The wounds that you got, were these from the napalm that was used on the ship? Where did you get these from?

Sgt. Lockwood: I faced a torpedo explosion below the waterline, less than ten feet from it. Looking at it, flash burns from the torpedo. There were 25 men who were killed all around me. The only thing I can figure is when the casing on the torpedo ruptured.I got flash burns and pretty well spared.

Luke: Well, you’re definitely lucky to make it out of there, and that’s just horrible.

Sgt. Lockwood:Fortunate beyond words.

Luke:Yes. Well, I don’t want to keep you away too long, and you’re about to give a speech, but is there anything that you’d want to say? Just to wrap this up, if there’s anything that you’d like people out there watching this video to know.

Sgt. Lockwood: Be careful who you elect to government.

Luke: All right. Well, thank you for the interview. I had a lot of fun. And this was really great.

Sgt. Lockwood: My pleasure. Luke.

Luke: All right. Thank you.

Additional interview segment with Sgt. Lockwood available only on YouTube.

The 9/11 Truth Movement is dead, and we have killed it.

What do I mean by “we”?

In my previous article, 9/11 was an Epstein Job, I traced connections between people within Jeffrey Epstein’s inner circle to the events of September 11th. Many individuals with close ties to Epstein had very odd behavior in relation to 9/11.

Epstein’s close friend and business partner, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, went on the BBC on the day of 9/11 to insinuate that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks and to declare that the US needed to wage a global war on terror.

The current United States Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, used to be a neighbor of Epstein. Coincidentally, the two had homes on 9 and 11 E 71st St in New York City. Lutnick was absent from his offices in the North Tower on 9/11. Lutnick acquired office space in the North Tower for a mutual friend of his and Epstein, Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York and the Former wife of Epstein Associate and alleged statutory rapist Prince Andrew. She had a meeting scheduled in the North Tower on 9/11 and, much like Lutnick, just so happened to be absent from the buildings during the attacks.

For more information like this, I encourage you to check out my last article or the documentary version of this material.

When I published the article, I received a lot of positive feedback, but I was also dismayed by the number of comments that had nothing to do with the concrete evidence and connections I presented. What I witnessed was endless debate and discussion over people’s various pet theories. In fact, it almost seemed as if some of the commenters were in an unspoken competition to have the most outlandish theory possible.

The feedback was a mirror of the 9/11 Truth movement. What I saw in the reflection was disagreement, dysfunction, and disinformation.

Proponents of mini-nukes, directed energy weapons, and theorists who believe that no planes hit any of the buildings have always been a part of the movement.

None of this is new information to me. After 15 years of investigating deep politics or what many label as “conspiracy theories”, I am acutely aware of the role that disinformation, social engineering, and psychological warfare plays in this space. Obviously, the elite class, the perpetrators of 9/11 and the War on Terror, cannot allow the truth to proliferate unmolested. In the age of the internet, it is difficult to completely memory hole things. So the best course of action is to poison the well and promulgate theories which remove culpability or attention away from the perpetrators.

Theories like “No Planes” theory serve to poison the well. As we will see, some of the first ‘proponents’ of this theory had ties to the world of intelligence. These kinds of theories also serve the purpose of removing our attention away from the forensic trail. We no longer pay attention to the suspicious tenants of the WTC with access to the buildings who could have planted explosives. We no longer investigate the suspicious trading indicative of foreknowledge of the attacks. We no longer look into the Israeli intelligence rings spying on American soil leading up to 9/11 or any of the other numerous, concrete, on-the-ground realities that don’t require us to get bogged down in convoluted discussions of fringe physics and exotic and sometimes non-existent technologies.

Similar phenomena can be observed in other ‘conspiracy’ communities. Some JFK assassination researchers get so fixated on where the shots came from (was it the Grassy Knoll or the Overpass?) that they become distracted from looking into people like James Angleton, the CIA liaison to Israel with numerous suspicious ties to the Kennedy assassination. During COVID, conversations about the virus being a bioweapon devolved into some theorizing that COVID was a hoax or that germ theory itself wasn’t real. Theories like this effectively remove all culpability from the perpetrators of the crime.

And if you don’t think that the CIA, Israeli intelligence, and any of your other enemies are participating in this kind of information warfare against you, then you yourself are a victim of it.

So let’s delve into some of these theories of 9/11 that serve to distract and discredit 9/11 Truth. Then let’s explore alternatives which can make sense of the logistical side of things. Finally, we will conclude on just some of the many, many concrete connections one can make to some of the possible perpetrators of the attacks. The latter is what we should all be focused on, whether one agrees or disagrees with my particular view of mini-nukes or what exactly hit the Pentagon.

Mini-Nukes

Years ago I read Black 9/11: Money, Motive, and Technology by Mark Gaffney, which remains an important contribution to the 9/11 Truth Movement today. However, in his subsequent articles at the Unz Review, where Gaffney theorizes that nukes were used to bring down the Twin Towers, the tone of his work shifts from objective investigation to theoretical speculation. As much as I respect Gaffney and his earlier work, his articles The Demolition of the World Trade Center and Did the Plowshare Program Set the Stage for Nuclear Terrorism on September 11th? fail to demonstrate that nukes were used in the attacks. In fact, the type of weaponry he postulates may have been used would violate the laws of physics.

The Criticality Barrier

In his article, Gaffney introduces us to the character of US nuclear weapons designer Theodore Taylor, who designed the smallest nuclear weapon ever fielded, the Davy Crockett. Gaffney refers to an interview with Taylor where the question was posed to him how much fissile material was needed to bring down the Twin Towers. Gaffney writes, “Taylor went on record that about six grams of fissile material would be sufficient to take down each tower. That’s .2 ounces of bomb-grade material per tower, the mass equivalent of 1–2 sticks of chewing gum. Or, in TNT equivalents: .1 kiloton.”

Gaffney then lays out his argument that the level of fallout from this small of an explosion, spread across the entirety of the WTC debris, would have been negligible. However, this portion of his argument is unnecessary to address because no such weapon has ever or could ever exist.

For a nuclear weapon to be functional, it must reach criticality—the physical threshold where the minimum amount of fissile material as well as the geometry and environment of its containment enable a sustained nuclear chain reaction. There is no escaping this reality.

So the question is: How small of a nuke has been made and what is theoretically possible?

As previously stated, Taylor designed the Davy Crockett, the smallest nuclear weapon ever fielded. The Crockett used a W54 nuclear warhead, the smallest variety of nuke ever made. The Crockett and the Falcon warhead version of the W54 came in weighing just under 51 lbs. In order to get the weapon so small, Taylor reduced the amount of fissile material, in this case plutonium-239, needed to reach criticality by altering the environment in which the fissile material was kept.

The optimum shape for achieving critical mass—amount of fissile material needed for a self-sustaining nuclear reaction—is a sphere. In nuclear physics, bare sphere critical mass—the amount of fissile material in the shape of a sphere to achieve a sustained nuclear reaction—is used as a measurement. The bare sphere critical mass of plutonium-239 is 10kg (22lbs). W54s used only 4–5kg (8.8 lbs–11 lbs) of fissile material. Neutron reflection and various other techniques were used to achieve this reduction of fissile material needed.

Gaffney goes on to say regarding his “.2 ounces of bomb-grade material per tower” and its “.1 kiloton” TNT equivalent, that even if it were a larger device more along the lines of .3 to .4 kilotons, making the total fissile material for both towers being 30–40 grams or 1.4 ounces, that this amount of radiation spread out across the WTC debris would be negligible.

Gaffney fails to acknowledge that the smallest nuke ever made, something that pushes what many consider the theoretical limit of how small a nuke can get, has 4–5 kg of fissile material. 4 kg is 100x larger than 40 grams. As stated, the W54 used 4–5 kg of plutonium and complex implosion devices to even make this operable. These hypothetical WTC nukes are anywhere from 705x smaller than any known nuke (if you use the .2 ounce of bomb grade material metric) to 100x smaller. This strains credulity.

An article published in the New Yorker titled The Curve of Binding Energy states that while Ted Taylor was looking at a sliver of uranium-235, he mused, “If ten per cent of this were fissioned, it would be enough to knock down the World Trade Center.”

Immediately preceding this musing of Taylor, the author John McPhee wrote, “It is theoretically possible to make a very destructive bomb with nuclear material the size of a pea, but that is beyond the practical capability of even the man of extraordinary skill in the art.”

Taylor, who later in life became a fierce opponent of nuclear weaponry, was making a statement about the danger of fissile materials because of the energy potential they possess. However, as McPhee points out, this is beyond the skill of the most extraordinarily skilled in the art.

Luckily for us, Taylor would not only share the amount of fissile material possessing enough energy to bring down the WTC buildings, but he would also speculate how small a nuke he thought could possibly be built. Taylor would know, considering his expertise in the field of small nuclear weaponry. Taylor said that a nuke with a 4.1 in diameter shell with a mass of 19 kg or 42 lbs is theoretically possible. This would be more comparable to a W54, which held 4–5kg of plutonium-239 rather than some kind of device holding .2 ounces to 1.4 ounces of fissile material.

Small nukes like the W54 carried a number of problems. The main problem that damages the theory of mini-nukes being used to demolish the WTC buildings is the wide amount of variability in the explosive yield. The explosive yield of the W54 was anywhere between 10 and 1000 tons of TNT.

At the lower end of the W54’s explosive potential, which was 10 tons of TNT, we can compare this to the Murrah Building Bombing in OKC, which was 2.5 tons of TNT. A 1,000-ton, or 1 kiloton, blast would be more comparable to the Beirut explosion, which you can watch here, which was an estimated 1.1 kilotons, or this military test of a 1 kiloton nuke you can watch here.

Would the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks really use weapons that could be the equivalent of 4 OKC bombings on the one hand and could potentially level the entire block on the other hand?

Gaffney might say that he isn’t suggesting fissile material of this magnitude. However, this would not be a rebuttal because, as demonstrated, a nuclear weapon requiring only .2 to 1.4 ounces of fissile material is not just experimental—it is impossible.

A nuke like the W54, which does exist in the realm of reality, would be a tactical nightmare given its volatile yield variability. Why would the culprits use such experimental and exotic weaponry when precise and field-tested technology with a long history of use exists?. We know certain tenants with access to the WTC buildings worked for corporations that had access and plausibly had access themselves to thermitic materials.

Given that Gaffney admits that the World Trade Center buildings could have been destroyed with conventional weapons and that the weapons proposed by Gaffney only exist in theory, I think we can apply Occam’s razor and conclude that something like thermate is the most likely cause of the collapse of the WTC buildings.

The Plowshare Program: History vs. Mythology

A large portion of Gaffney’s second article revolves around the history of the Plowshare Program. Here Gaffney finds what he believes to be the historical precedent for the kind of technology he theorizes brought down the Twin Towers.

So let’s explore the history of the Plowshare Program. Did they create the kind of nuclear explosives Gaffney believes were used in the 9/11 attacks? Did they discover methods to reduce radiological fallout to the extent that Gaffney claims? Was the Plowshare Program an overwhelming success that, through no fault of its own, wound up in the dustbin of history as Gaffney would have us believe?

During the latter half of the fifties, researchers from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory began conducting research into the possible use of nuclear explosions for peaceful purposes. The idea was that nuclear explosives could be used in projects that necessitated the removal of large amounts of earth or the breaking of rock for excavation.

Two months prior to Plowshare start, Pascal A, a bomb the equivalent of 55 tons of TNT, was detonated 500 feet underground. Bob Campbell, one of the Los Alamos Test Directors, said there was “about a tenth of the radiation on the ground around there” or, as Gaffney phrases it, a “90% reduction in fallout”.

A move towards the underground testing of nuclear explosives had begun during this period of time for a variety of reasons, chief among them being the reduction of radiological fallout. The Plowshare Program was a natural outgrowth of the incredible reduction in radiation achieved during the detonation of Pascal A.

The Atomic Energy Council (AEC) formed Project Plowshare in 1957, and in September of that year, the ‘Rainer’ shot at the Nevada Test Site was considered a success by the AEC. The 1.7 kiloton detonation was contained underground, preventing the escape of radiation. Plowshare was off to an explosive start.

An international moratorium on nuclear weapons testing stalled the Plowshare Program from 1958 until September of 1961 with Project Gnome. The idea was to see if a deep underground nuclear detonation could create heat to produce steam that could be used to generate electricity. Gnome was placed 1,184 feet deep in an underground tunnel that was supposed to seal upon detonation. Two to three minutes after the 3.1 kiloton detonation, smoke and steam rose from the tunnel. The entrance had failed to seal. Off-site contamination took place, but was alleged to have decayed quickly. However, the AEC said that exposure to on-site radiation was higher than expected.

The Sedan test conducted under the Plowshare Program in 1962 contaminated more US residents than any other nuclear test in history. More than 13 million Americans were exposed to radioactive dust particles released into the atmosphere. The explosive was lowered into a shaft 636 feet deep at Area 10 of the Nevada National Security Site. The goal of the test was to test the efficacy of nukes in the fields of mining and cratering. A 104 kiloton blast followed the detonation of the thermonuclear device. The largest-man made crater in history and a 12,000 foot radioactive dust cloud that carried radioactive detritus from Nevada to as far as Iowa and South Dakotas ensued. In Utah, radioiodine began appearing in milk samples due to Plowshare’s blunder.

Gaffney, in his article, quotes Edward Teller, the father of the hydrogen bomb’s glowing self-appraisal of his pet project Plowshare before a congressional committee, in which Teller said, “I can say, not with certainty, but with quite a bit of hope that we can make nuclear explosives for peaceful purposes so clean that the worry about radiation …may disappear completely.”

However, Gaffney fails to mention what Teller had to say regarding growing public concern about Plowshare in 1963 following the Sedan debacle, when he said, “the discussion about fallout has resulted in exaggerated and unwarranted fears so that even small quantities of radioactivity which are themselves not harmful are viewed with alarm.”

In 1967, the Plowshare Program would begin its foray into nuclear fracking.

The first attempt, titled Project Gasbuggy, took place in New Mexico, involving the equivalent of 29 kilotons of TNT detonating 4,200 feet underground, successfully breaking rock and stimulating gas production. However, the gas was unusable due to radioactive contamination.

Another attempt took place alongside the Colorado River in 1969. Project Rulison would only yield $1.5 million despite the project’s $11 million cost. The gas still continued to contain radioactive byproducts.

After four years, one last effort was made in Colorado, that being Project Rio Blanco. The 33 kiloton blast once again resulted in contamination; this time that contamination occurred in the form of strontium-90, which can cause cancer in bones and bone marrow.

It should also be noted, as reported by The People’s Atlas of Nuclear Colorado, “The Rulison explosion was also accompanied by significant ‘surface venting’ of irradiated smoke, dirt, and debris breaking through the surface of the mountain and escaping into the atmosphere even though the underground blast was detonated 8,400 feet below ground surface. It is not technically possible to “clean up” radionuclides from deep underground contamination or deep soil or water contamination. These sites will never be free of long-lasting radionuclides. They will remain a radiological hazard, particularly for mining operations, during earthquake events, or during other unforeseen occurrences. The radionuclides of concern at both test sites are Tritium, Krypton-85, and Carbon-14. C-14 is present primarily when attached to methane molecules. All three radionuclides are highly mobile in gas and water, and they are readily absorbed into the bloodstream, potentially causing cancer and other radio-illnesses, particularly to unborn fetuses, children, and women.”

The Lessler Paper Misrepresentation

Throughout his second article, Gaffney argues that Plowshare scientists found methods of greatly reducing radiation.

Gaffney cites in his article a paper by Richard Lessler entitled Reduction of Radioactivity Produced by Nuclear Explosives. Gaffney uses this paper to say, “Plowshare scientists had successfully reduced both neutron activation and fission decay products by ~99%.”

This is misleading.

The paper by Lessler is a design study using a computational algorithm known as the Monte Carlo Method to estimate the mathematical outcome of the reduction of neutron escape with boron shielding. It also hypothesizes that both a reduction in the size of the fission trigger and swapping certain materials in devices could achieve a large reduction in radioactivity. The paper never states anything about a 99% reduction. I presume Gaffney arrived at this number from the estimated difference between the real-life observed fallout from the Sedan bombing and the hypothetical projected performance of a hypothetical clean nuke proposed by Lessler.

In fact, it was the total unmitigated disaster that was the Sedan test which prompted the Plowshare Program to delve deeper into minimizing radioactivity. One can see the theoretical nature of these modifications reflected in the language of the Lessler paper as well as in this Stanford entry on the Plowshare Program. That’s not to say that the program didn’t make significant steps in the direction of limiting radioactivity.

However, even Lessler prefaces his paper with, “Although it is theoretically possible to have no radioactivity produced by nuclear explosives, this goal has not been achieved.”

Lessler also states in his paper, “Also, the assumptions used as they relate to emplacement techniques, neutron shielding, scavenging, and significant nuclides released to the environment do not necessarily represent the current state of the art.”

It stands to reason that if the Plowshare Program had found a way to reduce radiation from nuclear bombs by 99%, the program would have been a success despite public opposition. The reality of the Plowshare Program’s failure is not just a lack of commercial viability and cost inefficiency as Gaffney leads readers to believe.

However, the reality of the Plowshare Program and mini-nukes is much different than the article by Gaffney leads us to believe.

The Plowshare program is considered by almost everyone to be an unmitigated failure. The kind of weaponry theorized to have been used in the WTC by Gaffney has no historical basis, and all facts point in the direction of these kinds of weapons being a physical impossibility. Nuclear weapons can only be scaled down so much. Nothing even approaching the minuscule amounts of fission material that Gaffney suggests is physically possible. Scientists that Gaffney cites like Theodore Taylor and Richard Lessler are misrepresented. Taylor said that a 42 lb bomb with a 4.1 inch diameter is theoretically possible. This kind of weapon sounds much more similar to a W54 than it does Gaffney’s theoretical weapon. When Taylor mentioned 6 grams of fissile material being all that’s needed to bring down the towers, he is talking about the material’s energy potential. The supposed 99% reduction in radiation in the Lessler article is regarding a hypothetical weapon that could be made to reduce radioactivity in light of the Plowshare team’s abysmal track record.

In summary, Gaffney’s theoretical weapon used to demolish the WTC seems theoretical at best and impossible at worst. Gaffney’s telling of the Plowshare Program’s history exaggerates minor accomplishments and omits the many massive setbacks the program faced.

Final notes: In Gaffney’s second article, asks for someone to share with him if a radiation survey had been done at Ground Zero, dismissing a survey Dr. Steven Jones cited which took place off-site a month after the attacks. This paper here discusses the testing of three bulk samples of dust collected on September 16th and 17th, 2001. A review of radiation in dust levels found that alpha, beta, and gamma levels were consistent with background levels. The paper Investigating the Mechanics of Destruction at the Twin Towers on 9/11: The Case for Propelled Demolition by Wayne Coste, which speculates that the interior of the elevator shafts in the towers was lined with panels of nano-thermite, deviates from some of the conventional controlled demolition orthodoxy and may answer some of Gaffney’s questions.

Directed Energy Weapons

The Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) Hypothesis is synonymous with Dr. Judy Wood, the author of Where Did the Towers Go? Wood’s Ph.D. and background in Civil, Structural, and Materials Engineering give her work a veneer of scientific legitimacy. For over 15 years, Wood has espoused the theory that the Twin Towers were brought down via DEWs through speeches and interviews, which have cumulatively amassed millions of views on the internet. Within the past year, she’s been a guest on Patrick Bet-David’s show, which is among the 60 most popular podcasts in the world.

Despite her academic background, the most surface-level scrutiny of Wood’s theories concerning DEWs has displayed her work’s inability to account for the most fundamental questions related to the position she holds. This specifically can be seen in the exchange between Wood and Ph.D. Physicist Gregory Jenkins.

When questioned by Jenkins on basic issues concerning her 9/11 DEWs theory—the specific kind of weapon used, the amount of energy required to “dustify” steel, or even the existence of technology capable of such a thing—Wood didn’t even attempt to make an answer. In fact, she was entirely uninterested in providing any kind of answer because, according to her logic, one must figure out what happened before they can figure out how it happened. The notion that the burden of proof rests on her to provide the evidence that some kind of mechanism capable of her claims is physically possible seems to be a foreign concept to Dr. Wood.

Missing Rubble?

One of the primary arguments of the DEW camp is that vast amounts of WTC debris was “missing.” Dr. Gregory Jenkins, in his 31-page analysis of Judy Wood’s theory, dismantles this notion.

Wood often compares the amount of debris at Ground Zero to the rubble left after the demolition of the Seattle Kingdome Stadium. Jenkins explains why the two are not comparable. The empty space by volume of a sports stadium will not be similar to that of a skyscraper.

Instead of using the Kingdome as a structural model for comparison, Jenkins uses WTC 7 as his guide to see if there is, in fact, “missing” debris from the Twin Towers. The reason he uses WTC 7 as his guide is due to the fact that no buildings as massive as the Twin Towers had ever collapsed. Jenkins proceeds to calculate the volumetric compression— the reduction of an object’s material volume—of the Twin Towers after calculating roughly the size of the rubble pile WTC 7 left in its wake. After calculating the volumetric compression, the “missing” debris disappears.

Sophisticated math equations aren’t required to arrive at this conclusion.

Of the 200,000 tons of structural steel used to construct the WTC complex, 168,000 tons of steel was salvaged after the attacks. This is just some of the 1.8 million tons of rubble left at Ground Zero. One can clearly see tons of rubble in photographs of Ground Zero. This is not to mention all of the rubble which was quickly hauled off as part of the criminal destruction of evidence as discussed in my previous article.

The “Dustification” of Dr. Wood’s Hypothesis: Energy Requirements

The death knell for the DEW hypothesis is the absurd amount of energy that would be required to “dustify” steel. Dr. Jenkins, in his paper, calculates the energy that would be required to evaporate or “dustify” the steel in the upper 110 floors of one of the WTC buildings. The amount of energy needed to raise the temperature of steel from room temperature to the boiling point to gas would require 5x the power output of Earth. When Jenkins takes into account “losses from scattering and absorption in the atmosphere” and other atmospheric inefficiencies, the power required “swells to at least thousands of earths worth of power.”

The Particle Problem

Jenkins also points out that for a number of reasons the type of DEWs used could not be a photon beam. The other variety of DEWs is particle beams. Due to steel’s high reflectivity, Jenkins states that over 99% of incoming photons would have been reflected off of the steel. People who are mostly water would’ve been vaporized. Others would have suffered severe burns. The facades of buildings would have cracked. Tar in the streets would have melted.

DEW proponents like Wood will cite the charred cars outside the WTC buildings as “proof” of their theory. However, this ignores the fact that thermate reaches temperatures above steel’s melting point, the existence of localized hotspots, and that cars could have been struck by debris leaking combustible fluids. As Jenkins points out, a burning piece of paper or piece of hot metal would be sufficient for ignition of such combustible fluids. Mythical energy weapons are by no means needed to explain the charred vehicles.

The DEW Distraction

Dr. Judy Wood and her DEW theory not only ask us to believe in the existence of unknown weaponry which contradicts all known physics, but it also distracts us from investigating the principal players who had the means, motive, and ability to conduct the 9/11 attacks. This theory also serves the function of tainting any perceived legitimacy the 9/11 Truth Movement may have in the public mind. DEW theory does the work of the 9/11 perpetrators for them by distracting from the tangible, material evidence at our disposal and sending its adherents on a wild goose chase in search of magical energy rays. The DEWs hypothesis relegates 9/11 Truth to a fringe hypothesis rather than a forensic, criminal investigation.

“No Planes” Theory

The theory most frequently promoted in the comments of my previous article was that no planes were used in the 9/11 attacks. Some proponents of this view are Dr. Judy Wood, Former Department of Labor Chief and Bush Administration official Morgan Reynolds, and former MI5 agent turned whistleblower David Shayler. Variations of “No Planes” theory includes but is not limited to—missiles or drones struck the towers, missiles or drones cloaked by holograms struck the towers, and nothing struck the towers, with all footage depicting planes striking the Twin Towers having been digitally altered with CGI.

A Case Study in Information Warfare

My first encounter with “No Planes” theory was a decade ago when I stumbled upon a YouTube video of John Lear advocating his own unique theory of the planes being holograms. Despite my disbelief in the official story regarding the hijackers and their supposed incredible aviation feats on September 11th, Lear’s talk of holograms struck me as intellectually bankrupt compared to some of the analysis I had seen relating to the hijacked planes. What I was unaware of at the time was Lear’s colorful history.

John Lear is the son of Learjet magnate Bill Lear. Due to their tense relationship, the two became estranged, with Bill Lear excluding John from his will. More importantly, John Lear was a CIA pilot from 1967 until 1982, flying secret missions in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and Africa. Lear was a pilot for the CIA’s covertly owned and controlled Air America during the Vietnam War. Air America was likely involved in drug trafficking out of Laos or, at the very least, turned a blind eye to the Laotian military’s involvement in the international drug trade. Given the CIA’s long and sordid history in relation to the drug trade as a source of black budget funds and a means of social control, one has to wonder what Lear’s work as an asset of the agency entailed.

Shortly after his stint flying CIA planes, Lear would make his way into the conspiracy world, appearing on George Knapp’s television show to talk about extraterrestrials and posting to the early internet bulletin board Paranet claiming that the US government had close contact with aliens. Lear became a prominent voice in the UFO community with lurid tales of alien abductions, alien implants, and alien-human hybrids.

Lear befriended Bill Cooper, a naval intelligence officer turned conspiracy theorist. Cooper brought into the UFO community the sort of right populist type conspiracism that served as the proto-MAGA type conspiracies one finds today in subcultures like QANON and in figures like Alex Jones. Cooper would later turn on Lear, accusing him of being a CIA plant. Cooper came to believe that the government targeted him with disinformation concerning aliens to distract him from the small cabal of elites foisting their New World Order agenda on an unwitting populace.

Bill Cooper’s intuition regarding his former drinking buddy Lear may not have been too far off the mark.

In 1989, Lear hosted The Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) annual convention in Las Vegas, Nevada. Despite controversy amongst others involved with MUFON, Lear scheduled a number of speakers who were supposed to independently verify Paul Bennewitz’s story of discovering an underground base ran by the US government in conjunction with extra-terrestrials.

The main speaker at the conference, Bill Moore, revealed to the attendees gathered at the MUFON event that he was an intelligence asset involved in a disinformation campaign targeting Bennewitz along with Air Force Sergeant Richard C. Doty. One of the goals of this intelligence operation, according to Moore, was to disseminate information and study how it passed from person to person to better understand information channels.

Lear’s role in the promotion of Paul Bennewitz—a man systematically broken by psychological warfare and undercover agents—should be a cause for concern in relation to the role he played in the 9/11 Truth Movement. We should all closely scrutinize figures like this in our midst lest we have our minds fractured and institutionalized like Bennewitz.

Interestingly, Lear signed an affidavit and provided expert testimony in relation to a lawsuit that former Bush Administration official Morgan Reynolds brought against contractors in the NIST 9/11 investigation. Dr. Judy Wood was involved in similar lawsuits.

So what are we to make of the fact that some of the most prominent proponents of “No Planes” theory are a former MI5 agent, a former Bush Administration official, and a CIA pilot accused by a former friend of being a CIA plant who was involved with intelligence assets conducting a documented disinformation campaign against those in the conspiracy milieu?

The Physical Reality of “No Planes” Claims

“No Planes” theorists often rely on three core arguments: the aluminum of the planes could not penetrate the steel of the Twin Towers; that there was missing airplane debris; and that impact holes in the Twin Towers and Pentagon were too small for the aircraft alleged to have struck them.

Aluminum vs. Steel

“No Planes” theorists ask how “hollow aluminum tubes” were capable of penetrating the steel of the North and South Towers. This ignores the physics of kinetic energy. The planes were not merely “hollow aluminum tubes”; they contained heavy, non-aluminum equipment—landing gear, engines, and massive keel beams—which delivered the primary force of the impact. The planes were travelling at incredible speeds of 494 mph and 586 mph. The wings were filled with thousands of gallons of jet fuel.

Kinetic energy–the energy an object possesses due to its motion—can cause lightweight objects to pass through heavier objects due to speed. An object traveling at fast speeds can go through stronger material despite being constructed of a weaker material. We can see numerous examples of how kinetic energy can send weaker material through stronger material. On YouTube, you can watch a pumpkin go through a van, a ping-pong ball go through a paddle, and water cutting through aluminum.

It should also be noted that the wings and fuselages didn’t cut into the buildings like a knife through butter. Rather, they went through the exterior facades before shredding, decelerating, and fragmenting.

“Missing Debris”

“No Planes” proponents claim that there is a lack of large, intact plane parts from the 9/11 attacks in the debris. They cite this as evidence of their position. Conveniently, the same group who describe planes in such fragile terms as it relates to the “steel vs. aluminum” argument suddenly begins to speak of commercial airliners as if they are indestructible when it comes to the alleged absence of debris.

The notion that there should be large, intact plane parts found in the debris is contradicted by footage of Sandia National Laboratory’s F-4 Crash test, where a jet striking a concrete wall at 480 mph is reduced to “confetti.” This is similar to the fate shared by the planes on 9/11 upon impact with the steel and concrete of the WTC buildings. The aluminum and fuselage were similarly reduced to confetti.

However, large and intact parts of the plane did survive—engine cores, landing gear, and flight components.

An engine from Flight 175 was recovered from Murray St after travelling through the South Tower. The landing gear was found on top of a nearby building. A section of the fuselage was also found atop WTC 5. Furthermore, the engine core and blade disk of Flight 175 were recovered.

Another argument concerning the lack of debris is that the flight recorders of Flight 175 and 11 were not recovered. However, in my previous article I discussed the criminal cover-up of WTC debris and how the claim by authorities that the flight data recorders of these planes were not found is contradicted by a number of people at Ground Zero. Two Ground Zero workers claimed that they helped authorities find three of the four black boxes in October of 2001. One of them, New York City firefighter Nicholas DeMasi, described the recovery of the devices. Additionally, a source from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said, “Off the record, we had the boxes. You’d have to get the official word from the FBI as to where they are, but we worked on them here.” (Despite supposedly not finding the black boxes, which were constructed of titanium, one of the hijackers’ passports was found in near pristine condition.)

The cover-up and criminal destruction of evidence, while suggestive, does not suggest that there were no planes in the attacks.

Human remains from passengers aboard Flights 11 and 175 were discovered and identified through DNA testing.

Among the human remains found from passengers aboard Flight 175 was a 6-inch piece of bone belonging to Peter Hanson and bone fragments of Lisa Frost. Alona Abraham’s remains were identified using DNA samples.

33 victims aboard Flight 11, which struck the North Tower, were identified. This means that half of the victims were identified. 3 more were identified in subsequent years with the advent of new DNA technology.

Impact Holes

Now let’s address another one of the primary concerns of “No Planes” theorists, that being that the impact holes in the buildings were not large enough to accommodate the alleged planes.

Let’s start by looking at the hole in the Pentagon, which has been an intense subject of debate in the 9/11 Truth community for years, even outside “No Planes” theories. In fact, probably more 9/11 Truthers believe that it was not a Boeing 757 that struck the Pentagon than 9/11 Truthers who do believe it to have been a Boeing 757.

For a comprehensive demonstration of the Pentagon impact hole matching that of a Boeing 757, I would encourage everyone to read this ISGP Studies article in its entirety. To avoid reiterating the entirety of the ISGP article, I will rely upon other evidence aside from the photographic analysis employed in that piece to demonstrate that a plane did in fact hit the Pentagon.

Pieces of engine and wheels were found at the crash site of the Pentagon, with the photographed debris matching that of a 757. These photos are lifted from the previously mentioned ISGP Studies article with helpful annotations accompanying each image.

While from the onset the damage done to the Pentagon may not seem extensive enough for Flight 77 to have been the instrument used in the attack, a closer examination shows that a Boeing 757-223 is more than capable of this. In fact, alternative explanations fail to have the explanatory power that it was Flight 77 which hit the Pentagon. Eyewitness testimony and debris that matches that of a Boeing 757 further corroborates this.

None of this is to say that there are no unanswered questions about the attacks on the Pentagon. How did Hani Hanjour, who is alleged to have flown Flight 77, accomplish a 270-330-degree turn descending 8,000 feet traveling at 530 MPH when he couldn’t even handle flying a single-engine Cessna. Then Hanjour just so happened to strike the Pentagon in the Budget Analyst Office, an area that had previously undergone restoration and was stronger than other areas of the building. This was the day after Donald Rumsfeld announced $2.3 trillion the Pentagon couldn’t account for.

There is also the question of why the FBI hasn’t produced clear footage of the impact. As ISGP Studies points out, “the government, through the FBI, is actually benefiting from having this giant, divisive red herring out there.”

Without belaboring the point, the impact holes on the North and South Tower are not too small to have been a Boeing 767. In fact, the profile of the impact zones matches that of a 767 on both towers. The steel columns on the outermost 20 feet of each wing were undamaged on the North Tower, which shouldn’t be a surprise to No Plane theorists who harp on how much stronger steel is than aluminum. The below photo shows a 767 with a wingspan of 155 feet superimposed on the North Tower’s impact hole, which was 207 feet in width.

Jim Hoffman, from whom I took the above graphic, provides us with the below graphic and its following annotation in relation to the South Tower’s area of impact.

“This photograph shows the South Tower impact gash about 40 seconds after the collision of Flight 175. The profile of a 767, including both the wings and tail, is visible in the imprint.”

​

Eyewitness Testimony

The easiest way to demonstrate the sheer implausibility that no planes were used in the attacks is the number of eyewitnesses who claimed to have seen a plane fly into the buildings.

In the case of the Pentagon hundreds if not thousands of people witnessed the event due to a traffic jam on the west side of the building. An analysis of different eyewitness reports concerning the plane crashing into the Pentagon shows that of 89 people who saw an object hit the Pentagon, 45 described seeing a plane while using words like ‘airliner’. Dozens said they specifically saw an American Airlines jet. Witnesses of the plane that struck the Pentagon also seem to agree on details such as the plane banking to the left and hitting light posts. One can read a lengthy collection of these quotes on the ISGP Studies website.

Concerning arguments relating to a supposed lack of debris from Flight 77, multiple eyewitnesses claim to have seen wreckage present inside the building.

Lt. Col. Tom McClain said, “I saw the remains of the engines in the North parking lot of the Pentagon as well as melted aluminum and other debris left from the aircraft.”

The Army Deputy Chief of Public Affairs Charles H Krohn said, “One of the aircraft’s engines somehow ricocheted out of the building and arched into the Pentagon’s mall parking area between the main building and the new loading dock facility.”

Other witnesses described seeing pieces of aircraft skin falling from the sky as well as burning fiberglass insulation drifting down towards the highway near the Pentagon.

The attacks on the WTC buildings took place during morning rush hour in Manhattan, meaning that hundreds if not thousands in traffic, on the street, or in adjacent buildings saw the planes strike the buildings.

One does not have to look hard to find eyewitness testimony of people who claim to have seen planes strike the North and South Towers.

The “No Planes” Verdict

Given the above information, I think that discussion of whether or not early 2000’s technology could have produced convincing CGI footage of planes striking the WTC buildings or if the military possessed the ability to cloak missiles in holograms is unnecessary. Eyewitness testimonies, the presence of debris which matches the alleged hijacked planes, and the plausible physics of planes causing the damage observed in the WTC buildings and Pentagon is sufficient to conclude that “No Planes” is an untenable theory. Also, the history of intelligence assets and charlatans promoting this theory is a cause for concern, suggesting that “No Planes” theory may be a form of information warfare.

The Controlled Demolition of 9/11 Justice

What should the goal of the 9/11 Truth movement be?

Well, what good is truth without justice?

Justice for the victims of 9/11 and their families.

Justice for the thousands of American troops who died overseas under the guise of defending our freedoms—freedoms that were being eroded to “keep us safe” while the military-industrial complex built a sweeping surveillance dragnet around us all.

Justice for the millions dead in the Middle East for the benefit of Israel and their Neocon lapdogs that roam the halls of American power.

But what is the goal of the 9/11 Truth movement as it stands?

From my engagement with it, it seems as if it is endless division and debate. To squabble endlessly over minutiae. To promote the most far-flung theory as if that heightens your conspiracy theorist street cred.

Who is responsible for the controlled demolition of 9/11 justice?

The same class of Neocons and Zionists who benefited and perpetrated the attacks themselves.

Cui bono?

In the next part of this two-part series, we will address a few different subjects:

• A plausible explanation for the collapse of the WTC buildings.

• Individuals and groups with means and motives to bring down the towers.

• The individuals, groups, connections, and intelligence agencies on which the 9/11 Truth Movement should place their focus, as opposed to the current state of endless debate regarding the physics of building collapse and the means by which the towers were brought down. While this perhaps may be of academic interest, it has only served as an impediment to the movement.

The latter point is of the utmost importance.

It is our only chance of turning 9/11 Truth into 9/11 Justice.

​

Above is the Documentary which this article is essentially a Transcript of. Like, share, and subscribe to my YouTube Channel to see the rest of my videos and stay updated on all future content.

The Epstein-9/11 Nexus

“We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.” — Benjamin Netanyahu, ‘Netanyahu says 9-11 attacks good for Israel,’ Ha’aretz (April 16, 2008)

“Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, ‘It’s very good.’ Then he edited himself: ‘Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.’” (A Day of Terror: The Israelis; Spilled Blood is Seen as Bond That Draws Two Nations Closer,” New York Times, Sept. 12, 2001.)

In this video, we are going to be investigating people in Epstein’s immediate circle with suspicious behavior related to the September 11th, 2001 attacks. By exploring these connections, we will see how what many have referred to as the Epstein class has more to do with 9/11 than you might think. Our investigation is going to show us that people directly connected to Epstein, as well as individuals in Epstein’s orbit, profited from the September 11th attacks in certain cases. Others were involved in the cover-up of what truly took place on 9/11. Others sowed the official narrative into the public consciousness. Some of these people in Epstein’s circle seemed to have advanced knowledge of the attacks. A few of these individuals’ behavior during 9/11 is so suspicious that one can wonder if they potentially have direct involvement themselves. And finally, we’ll even see that Epstein himself had more to do with things than most would have thought. Perhaps this is the reason why the DOJ has withheld a massive volume of documents before, during, and after the 9/11 attacks.

The former Director of the Mossad, Isser Harel, in a 1979 conversation with journalist Michael Evans, had what one could generously call incredible foresight. Evans recalls the interview in the Jerusalem Post, “I sat with former Mossad chief Isser Harel for a conversation about Arab terrorism. As he handed me a cup of hot tea and a plate of cookies, I asked him, ‘Do you think terrorism will come to America, and if so, where and why?’ Harel looked at his American visitor and replied, ‘I fear it will come to you in America. America has the power but not the will to fight terrorism…’ As to the where, Harel continued, ‘New York City is the symbol of freedom and capitalism. It’s likely they will strike the Empire State Building, your tallest building [he mistakenly thought] and a symbol of your power.’ …Twenty-one years later, the first part of Harel’s prediction came true; except, of course, that the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center were much taller than the Empire State Building.” - Jerusalem Post

As Christopher Bollyn, the author of Solving 9/11, says in one of his articles, “Eight years after Israeli intelligence chief Isser Harel predicted that Arab terrorists would attack the tallest building in New York City, two of his veteran Mossad agents obtain the security contract for the World Trade Center from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. The Port Authority tears up the contract when it discovers that Avraham Shalom (Bendor), the head of Atwell Security of Tel Aviv, is using a fake name and has a conviction in Israel, as the former chief of the Shin Bet, for the murder of two Palestinians.”

Bollyn goes on to say in this same article, “Jules Kroll Associates, a Zionist firm which now includes the veteran Israeli Mossad agent Avraham Shalom Bendor, takes over security management of the World Trade Center in the wake of the bombing.”

The Medusa Touch - Plane Crash scene (HD)

Arnon Milchan, an Israeli intelligence asset, was the Executive Producer of The Medusa Touch, in which a Boeing 747 crashes into a skyscraper.

Ehud Barak with his Crystal Ball Can See Bin Laden in Afghanistan and the Coming War on Terror

Not only did people involved with Israeli intelligence seem to know about 9/11 in advance of the attacks, but it would be none other than Epstein’s bff Ehud Barak who would sow the mainstream narrative into the public consciousness only an hour after the attacks.

Ehud Barak Interview An Hour After 9/11 Attacks (BBC News)

Somehow, Barak knew who the culprit was not only before any investigation had been done, but while most of the world was still reeling in shock from the violent spectacle. On the BBC, Barak would say that it was Osama Bin Laden who had perpetrated the attacks, that Bin Laden was hiding in Afghanistan, and that America needed to wage a war on terror in response to the attacks.

One of the people Epstein most frequently communicated with in the files is former Israeli Prime Minister and former head of Israeli military intelligence Ehud Barak. Epstein, at the behest of Barak, would let a senior Israeli military intelligence official stay at his Manhattan apartment for weeks at a time—the same apartment the Israeli government had furnished with a security system. Epstein and Barak helped build an Israeli police state in the country of Côte d’Ivoire; they helped broker a security cooperation agreement between Israel and Mongolia; they sold Israeli cybersecurity to the United Arab Emirates; they helped foster a relationship between the Israelis and India; and they helped build a back channel to Russia for Israel during the Syrian Civil War.

As I stated in my first video, “After Ehud Barak left Israeli leadership, Epstein would help him enter the world of surveillance tech by connecting Barak to Peter Thiel, the evil mastermind of Palantir, with whom Epstein had a relationship, including Epstein investing $4 million to the Thiel-co-founded Valar Ventures. Epstein would help bring Thiel in on the incredible business venture that is Carbyne 911, which makes advanced emergency service communications tech, meaning that when you call 9-1-1, Epstein’s Israeli buddies may be getting all kinds of data from your phone. The company was founded by Ehud Barak and former Unit 8200 members, an Israeli intelligence service that specializes in signal intelligence, counterintelligence, and cyberwarfare.”

Ronald Lauder and the Privatization of the WTC Complex

The New York Port Authority owned the WTC from 1973 until July 24, 2001, less than two months before the 9/11 attacks. However, in 1998, the port authority made the decision to privatize the WTC complex.

Ronald Lauder headed the at the time Governor of New York George Pataki’s New York State Commission of Privatization and the New York State Research Council on Privatization and is largely responsible for the privatization of WTC 1 and 2. It should be noted that Pataki’s wife was employed by Lauder and that Lauder was one of Pataki’s largest campaign contributors.

In April of 2001, a group of several different investors led by Silverstein Properties came to an agreement, and Larry Silverstein, who had already acquired WTC 7, signed a 99-year lease for $3.2 billion for buildings 4 and 5 with the help of a loan from GMAC, the lending arm of General Motors, and loans from others. Silverstein only put $14 million of his own money down on the lease. The WTC had earlier that year been estimated to be worth $1.2 billion, and the Port Authority only had $1.5 billion insurance coverage on the WTC, but Silverstein managed to finagle $3.55 billion of insurance on the buildings. Silverstein’s insurance broker was unable to cover such a large amount, and the deal had to be split among 25 different dealers. The complicated and unusual deal would be finalized in September 2001. The Silverstein group was even given the right to rebuild and expand if the buildings were to be destroyed. And none of this is to even mention the fact that the WTC buildings had been in the process of having asbestos removed from the buildings, which was an extremely costly process. While some of the buildings had already had some of the asbestos removed, as of May of 2001, prior to Silverstein acquiring the buildings, the Port Authority received a ruling on a longstanding suit against their insurers seeking more than $600 million dollars to cover the costs of asbestos removal ultimately receiving a ruling that the all-risk insurance policy did not entitle their insurers to include this under their coverage.

As James Corbett of the Corbett Report states in 9/11 Trillions: Follow the Money, where I have drawn the above information on Silverstein from, “Within hours of the destruction of the Twin Towers on September 11th, Silverstein was on the phone to his lawyers, trying to determine if his insurance policies could construe the attacks as two separate, insurable incidents rather than one.” Silverstein spent years in the courts attempting to win $7.1 billion from his $3.55 billion insurance policy, and in 2007, he walked away with $4.55 billion, the largest single insurance settlement ever. As soon as the deal was announced, Silverstein sued United and American Airlines for a further $3.5 billion for their “negligence” in the 9/11 attacks, a claim that was struck down by the courts but is still on appeal.”

“Perhaps even more outrageously, in a secret deal in 2003, the Port Authority agreed to pay back 80% of their initial equity in the lease, but allowed the Silverstein group to maintain control of the site. The deal gave Silverstein, Goldman, and Cayre $98 million of the $125 million they put down on the lease, and a further $130 million in insurance proceeds that were earmarked for the site’s rebuilding.”

“In the end, Silverstein profited from the 9/11 attacks to the tune of $4.55 billion and counting.”

So who is Ronald Lauder, the man who privatized the WTC buildings and who ultimately made Silverstein’s insurance heist possible through securing the privatization of the WTC buildings?

Ronald Lauder is the sole heir of the Estee Lauder cosmetics fortune as well as the President of the World Jewish Congress, working alongside others like Baron Dave Rene De Rothschild of the prominent Rothschild banking family. He is also a long-standing friend as well as a supporter of Epstein associate Donald Trump, with the two having known each other for more than 50 years. Trump and Lauder also share ties with Roy Cohn, who was Trump’s mentor. In the first video on this channel, we briefly addressed Roy Cohn’s sexual blackmail ring, serving as one of the many predecessors to the Epstein blackmail ring.

Whitney Webb writes in an article for Mint Press News, “Though the exact nature of their early friendship is unclear, it is evident that they shared many of the same connections, including to the man who would later count them both as his clients, Roy Cohn. While much has been said of the ties between Cohn and Trump, Cohn was particularly close to Lauder’s mother, Estee Lauder (born Josephine Mentzer). Estee was even counted among Cohn’s most high-profile friends in his New York Times obituary.”

“A small window into the Lauder-Cohn relationship surfaced briefly in a 2016 article in Politico about a 1981 dinner party held at Cohn’s weekend home in Greenwich, Connecticut. The party was attended by Ronald Lauder’s parents, Estee and Joe, as well as Trump and his then-wife Ivana, who had a weekend home just two miles away. That party was held soon after Cohn had helped Reagan secure the presidency and had reached the height of his political influence. At the party, Cohn offered toasts to Reagan and to then-Senator for New York Alfonse D’Amato, who would later urge Ronald Lauder to run for political office.”

“Two years later, in 1983, Ronald Lauder — whose only professional experience at that point was working for his parents’ cosmetics company — was appointed to serve as United States Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for European and NATO Affairs. Soon after his appointment, he served on the Dinner Tribute Committee for a dinner hosted by the Jewish fraternal and strongly pro-Israel organization B’nai B’rith, the parent organization of the controversial Anti-Defamation League (ADL), in Roy Cohn’s honor. Cohn’s influential father, Albert Cohn, was the long-time president of B’nai B’rith’s powerful New England-New York chapter, and Roy Cohn himself was a member of B’nai B’rith’s Banking and Finance Lodge.”

“The dinner specifically sought to honor Cohn for his pro-Israel advocacy and his efforts to “fortify” Israel’s economy, and its honorary chairmen included media mogul Rupert Murdoch, Donald Trump, and then-head of Bear Stearns Alan Greenberg, all of whom are connected to Jeffrey Epstein.”

It should also be noted that Lauder was an associate of Alan Greenberg, who hired Epstein at Bear Stearns after Epstein’s stint at the Dalton School.

Lauder is also a close associate of Benjamin Netanyahu and was instrumental in the genocidal war criminal’s rise to power. This is the same man who said that 9/11 was very good for Israel. Lauder is also a financier of Israel’s Likud party. Lauder, after working for his parents’ cosmetics company, would work as the United States Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for European and NATO affairs during Ronald Reagan’s first term, as well as doing some work for B’nai B’rith, the parent organization of the ADL, helping facilitate a dinner in honor of Roy Cohn. In 1986, Lauder became the US ambassador to Austria, which brings us back to the question of Epstein’s passport.

Lauder had ties to both Epstein and those in Epstein’s circle. As previously mentioned, he was a member of the Mega Group alongside close Epstein associate Les Wexner, whom I’ve addressed his relationship with Epstein in detail in the previous two videos/articles. Epstein formed a limited liability company for Lauder and Leon Black for them to purchase a $25 million work of art. Lauder is part of Nicole Junkermann’s fan club, according to Epstein email releases. There are also years of Epstein and Lauder communication.

Perhaps what is more interesting than all of this is the role Lauder potentially played in acquiring Epstein’s notorious Austrian passport. As previously mentioned, Lauder became the US ambassador to Austria in 1986. Whitney Webb in Mega Group, Maxwells, and Mossad points out that the Austrian Passport Epstein had with his picture and a fake name on it that was discovered after the raid on his Manhattan home had been given to him by a friend sometime in the eighties, according to his defense lawyers.

The Associated Press writes, “a friend gave it to him [Epstein] in the 1980s after some Jewish-Americans were informally advised to carry identification bearing a non-Jewish name when traveling internationally during a period when hijackings were more common.”

Webb also points out that Epstein did not meet the ‘conventional qualifications’ for acquiring such a passport, such as long-term residency in Austria, so he would have needed to obtain this passport by ‘unconventional means’.

Webb writes, “In addition, Lauder was well-connected to Epstein’s former patron — former head of Bear Stearns Alan Greenberg, who had hired Epstein in the late 1970s immediately after the latter was fired from the Dalton School — and Donald Trump, another friend of Lauder and Greenberg who began his friendship with Epstein in 1987, the same year the fake Austrian passport was issued. In 1987, Epstein also began his relationship with his principal financier, Leslie Wexner, who is also closely associated with Lauder (though some sources claim that Epstein and Wexner first met in 1985 but that their strong business relationship was not established until 1987).”

Webb points out that not only was Lauder the Austrian Ambassador at the time in which the passport was issued to be the unconventional channel which Epstein acquired the passport from, but that given the Mossad’s track record of using ambassadors to procure fake passports for their operatives, Lauder likely was the one who did this service for Epstein. It should be quickly noted that Lauder was a financier of the IDC Herzliya University in Israel, which is closely associated with Mossad, Israeli intelligence, and their recruiters.

Epstein’s Buddies are Late to Work in the WTC on the Morning of 9/11

The ties of Jeffrey Epstein to people with suspicious activity in relation to the events of 9/11 do not stop here. Epstein had at least two associates who were scheduled to be in the WTC buildings on 9/11 who just so happened to be late when the attacks began.

One of these “lucky” associates is Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York and the former wife of Prince Andrew, who at this point is probably best known for his ties to Epstein and the alleged abuse of Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre Roberts when she was a minor. And we can let Ferguson speak for herself on the matter, “My charity Chances for Children was located on the World Trade Centre N Tower. I was meant to be there that morning 22 years ago, but an interview ran late. The Little Red doll, the charity’s mascot, was found in the rubble. Today I am thinking of those who lost their lives.”

Now, let’s discuss the other Epstein associate conspicuously late to work on the morning of 9/11, that being none other than our current US Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick.

Lutnick, who at the time of the 9/11 attacks was the Chief Executive and President of Cantor Fitzgerald, having risen up the ranks of the financial services and investment banking firm under the tutelage of Gerald Cantor, was conspicuously absent from work on the morning of 9/11. When American Airlines Flight 11 struck the North Tower, the plane hit just above the offices of Cantor Fitzgerald. 658 Cantor Fitzgerald employees would die in the attacks, but Lutnick was late because he was supposedly taking his son Kyle to his first day of school at Horace Mann Elementary. No mainstream reporting discounts this story, and Horace Mann is a private school, but it is worth noting that NYC public schools started Elementary School on September 5th in 2001.

Lucky Lutnick was not the only one at Cantor to be spared during the 9/11 attacks. As reported in New York Magazine, “The luckiest people in New York? The twenty Cantor Fitzgerald staff members let go on Monday, September 10, most of whom have loyally returned to the firm.”

Lutnick invested heavily in eSpeed, an electronic bond trading platform developed by Cantor Fitzgerald, which also had its headquarters in the North Tower. In a study entitled Mitigation, Prevention, and Preparedness we can see that Lutnick’s luck also extended to some other high-ranking people at Cantor and eSpeed: “Most of the top technology executives had been out of the office, including Matt Claus, eSpeed’s current CTO, and Noviello’s right-hand man, who had been scheduled to go on the fishing trip.”

For Cantor Fitzgerald, the luck that these were the men who survived due to a scheduled fishing trip was incredibly lucky considering that, as reported by the New York Times, “In fact, Mr. Lutnick’s electronic push helped Cantor stay afloat after Sept. 11. Cantor lost almost all of its brokers, but eSpeed did not need brokers. Without the new trading technology, Cantor might have gone under.”

We can read in this New York Magazine article, “To the awe of Wall Street and government regulators, Cantor was able to get the company’s U.S. eSpeed operations – a crucial link in the Treasury markets – up and running two days after the attack. But thanks to what he describes as a series of “miracles” – a golf outing with clients; a corporate fishing trip, canceled at 8 a.m., that prevented the disappointed anglers from getting to their desks by 9 – a handful of employees who ran the stock-trading desk and other profitable divisions were out of the office on that horrible date.”

In this FBI document included in the Epstein files, we can see that someone with a Series 30 license, who it seems must have worked at Cantor Fitzgerald, meaning he handled regulatory reporting and was the most senior person in his unit, would make a number of interesting allegations about Lutnick and Cantor Fitzgerald to the FBI.

In the report, we can see that perhaps 9/11 was not the setback for Cantor Fitzgerald that many believed it to be. In the document, the man alleged to the FBI that Cantor Fitzgerald ran a ‘global Ponzi scheme’, was involved with money laundering, and conducted illegal wire transfers.

The man also told the authorities, “HOWARD LUTNICK (LUTNICK) ran everything, and he maintained a very small circle. LUTNICK instructed all of the fraud being committed. He used philanthropy as a smokescreen for illegal activity. CANTOR FITZGERALD was not doing well pre-9/11. After the events of September 11, 2001, CANTOR FITZGERALD was doing well. CANTOR FITZGERALD couldn’t afford people’s salaries and then was able to hire people and give people opportunities.”

And now here is where things get really crazy. Epstein associate got Epstein-associate Sarah Ferguson her office space in the WTC, and both of them just so happened to be running late to the WTC that day. “LUTNICK gave SARAH FERGUSON (FERGUSON) office space above CANTOR FITZGERALD in New York for the CHILDREN IN CRISIS (CIC) charity. GHISLAINE MAXWELL (MAXWELL) and FERGUSON would attend Dolce Vita Parties, which raised money for CIC and STOW SCHOOL. CIC no longer existed.”

In the aftermath of 9/11, Lutnick decided on the immediate cessation of salaries to the families of those killed, which obviously drew harsh criticism. This was allegedly to keep the company afloat, and to his credit, he would later give the victims’ families 25% of the firm’s profits for 5 years and health insurance for ten years, and you can decide for yourself if this had been the plan all along or if it was in response to public outcry that ensued after cutting off all salaries to those widowed after 9/11.

Howard Lutnick has donated large sums of money to Zionist causes, as well as raising funds for the campaigns of both Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump. Lutnick would work at Cantor until being confirmed by the Senate as the US Secretary of Commerce, leaving the firm to his two sons. And, unsurprisingly, Lutnick has used his position to benefit his sons financial dealings.

Now let’s address Lutnick’s connections to Epstein.

Lutnick has continually downplayed his relationship with Epstein despite the fact that the two were neighbors with New York Townhouses on E 71st St. Oddly enough, the addresses of the homes were 9 and 11 E 71st St. You can find the following information concerning the NY homes and more about Lutnick in this article about Lutnick and his endeavors into the world of surveillance in this Unlimited Hangout article.

Lutnick’s townhouse was previously purchased by a company controlled by Leslie Wexner, whose President was none other than Jeffrey Epstein. Lutnick’s future home was then sold for ten dollars to a trust whom Epstein was a trustee of and the other home, which would come to be Epstein’s home later on, was being refurbished with a peculiar security system that was potentially used for blackmail purposes. Whether this was done for Lutnick’s future home, who’s to say? After Epstein had resided in the other home for a year, the 11 E 71st St address was sold to Comet Trust for $10, whose Trustee was Guido Goldman, whose father was a prominent Zionist, an associate of Henry Kissinger, and was reported to be the liaison between the CIA and the Council for Foreign Relations, of which Epstein was a member at the time. Comet trust was also connected to the Bronfman family of Seagrams liquor fame, who began to amass their fortune in the world of organized crime during the period of prohibition, and the family would later be involved in the world of Zionist philanthropy, with Charles Bronfman co-founding the Mega Group with Leslie Wexner, which created Birthright Israel, with Lutnick being one of the organization’s top donors. Comet went on to sell the property to Lutnick for $10, and Lutnick took out a $4 million mortgage on the home on the day of the sale.

Now let’s look at what Lutnick has to say about his relationship with Epstein.

Howard Lutnick on Living Next Door to Epstein, Surviving 9/11 & Late-Night Calls with Trump

Lutnick says Epstein greatest blackmailer to ever exist

So despite Epstein being so disgusting that Lutnick vowed to have nothing to do with him again, and having told the New York Post he had cut ties with Epstein in 2005, Lutnick has been shown corresponding with Epstein long after his trafficking conviction and even bringing his family to Little Saint James with his wife and him communicating on logistics for the visit, Lutnick inquiring about where to dock his yacht during the visit, discussing with Epstein what time to have dinner, Lutnick’s wife telling Epstein how many people were coming along with them and the age range of her children (not in a creepy manner but still), and Lutnick later on receiving an email from a redacted individual saying that Epstein wanted them to pass along that it was “Nice seeing you.”

We should also just briefly cover Lutnick’s involvement with Epstein and Brock Pierce in the hijacking of Bitcoin. Around the time of 2015-2017, when the ‘block size wars’ were taking place in the Bitcoin community, with the debate centering on how Bitcoin should accommodate handling more transactions, through either increasing the size of transaction blocks or keeping blocks small so normal people could still run the Bitcoin network on their computers. The small side won, leading to the Lightning network being made, meaning most payments took place off the main chain. This changed bitcoin from being a true peer-to-peer decentralized currency, bringing middlemen into the mix. Epstein helped ensure that this side would win the argument through Epstein’s funding of MIT’s Digital Currency Initiative as well as Epstein’s funding of Blockstream, both of whose developers preferred the small block over the large block solution.

This information I gathered from this fantastic article on The Brownstone Institute by Aaron Day titled The Hijacking of Bitcoin. Much more information concerning Epstein and his associates, Brock Pierce, and Howard Lutnick’s hijacking of Bitcoin, seeing that it no longer remained decentralized and anonymous, could be said. I will let Aaron Day’s summary of this give us the big picture as to what happened, and I encourage everyone to read the article and listen to his interview with James Corbett of The Corbett Report for a more detailed explanation. The article reads, “Brock Pierce ran the Bitcoin Foundation into the ground, opened the door for Epstein’s money, brokered Epstein’s Coinbase stake, sat in Epstein’s mansion pitching Bitcoin to Larry Summers, co-founded Tether, and kept emailing Epstein until 2018.”

“Tether then printed unbacked dollars to pump Bitcoin 50% in 2017.”

“Howard Lutnick, who lied about cutting ties with Epstein, took over management of Tether’s $130+ billion Treasury reserves before he even joined the Trump transition. He pushed for Treasury Secretary, missed, landed at Commerce, installed his ally Bo Hines as White House crypto advisor, had Hines ram through the GENIUS Act, then watched Hines quit the White House and immediately become CEO of Tether’s U.S. subsidiary.”

Finally, regarding Lutnick, he would also go on to be involved in the post-9/11 world of surveillance through the company Satellogic, where he sat on the board along with Steve Mnuchin. The company had a former Unit 8200 alum on its staff. Much more could be said about Lutnick, but for now, I will just direct you all to go read this article from Unlimited Hangout.

Rudy Giuliani, Epstein, a Corrupt NYPD Police Commissioner, and the Father-Son White Collar Criminal Clean-up Team

Now let’s dive into a convoluted thread that will ultimately lead us to Rudy Giuliani, whose actions on 9/11 would lead to the deaths of hundreds of first responders, and Giuliani’s actions both on 9/11 and the following days were instrumental in the cover-up of what truly took place that fateful day.

Epstein had finished serving 13 months of his 18-month sentence in July of 2009 and was released on probation and house arrest, which wasn’t much of a house arrest because he was frequently allowed to move back and forth from his various homes on his plane, take shopping trips, and go on walks around Palm Beach for ‘exercise.’ In August of 2010, he was relieved of his probationary status, and it is also around this time that Ghislaine and Epstein would begin to use the legal services of Marc Mukasey.

Why is this obscure lawyer important to our story?

Well, Marc Mukasey is the son of Michael Mukasey, the US Attorney General from September of 2007 to January of 2009, making Michael the Attorney General during the finalization of the Sweetheart Deal, as well as Epstein’s conviction and sentencing. Epstein’s sweetheart deal seemingly would need the ‘institutional blessing’ of Michael Mukasey, as it was phrased by Jeffery Epstein: The Cover-up Chronicles podcast.

The following year, after he was through with his sentencing, Epstein and Ghislaine would acquire legal counsel from Michael’s son Marc.

In the emails, it is not exactly clear what it was that Marc was doing for Epstein and Ghislaine. It should be noted, though, that starting in 2007, lawsuits from accusers and victims would begin being leveled against Epstein and in 2009, Virginia Giuffre filed her first suit against Epstein and in the 2010’s would publicly discuss his role in this sex trafficking ring involving royalty, prime ministers, and prominent politicians and businessmen.

So it seems likely that the man who allowed this Sweetheart deal to take place was the father of one of the men who either tried to help Epstein finagle his way out of these civil lawsuits from victims or possibly rehabilitate Epstein’s image after his first arrest.

But how does this tie into Giuliani and 9/11?

Well, the firm that Marc Mukasey worked for was none other than Bracewell and Giuliani. Marc Mukasey also worked for Giuliani’s presidential campaign in 2007, as well as helping Giuliani distance himself from the disgraced ex-NYPD boss Bernard Kerik, whom we will return to later. It should also be noted here that Marc’s father, Michael Mukasey, was extremely close to Giuliani, first becoming acquainted with Giuliani in the 1970s when working at the same law firm. Michael Mukasey also worked as a justice advisor along with his son during Giuliani’s presidential campaign. Interesting aside, Michael Mukasey penned a letter in 2010 to Obama to pardon Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard.

And while Giuliani’s ties to Donald Trump are well-known and established, it is worth noting that in addition to representing people such as FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried for his cryptocurrency fraud arrest and Congressman Matt Gaetz after allegations of sex trafficking, Marc would also represent Epstein associate Trump during his first term when people were probing into his finances.

Marc Mukasey also represented Israeli entrepreneur Joel Zamel, who formed a strategic partnership between his firm, Psy-Group, and Cambridge Analytica to help propel Trump into the Oval Office. Psy-Group was an Israeli Private Intelligence agency with headquarters in Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. In an article in The New Yorker entitled Private Mossad for Hire authors Adam Entous and Ronan Farrow write, “Psy-Group stood out from many of its rivals because it didn’t just gather intelligence; it specialized in covertly spreading messages to influence what people believed and how they behaved. Its operatives took advantage of technological innovations and lax governmental oversight. ‘Social media allows you to reach virtually anyone and to play with their minds,’ Uzi Shaya, a former senior Israeli intelligence officer, said. ‘You can do whatever you want. You can be whoever you want. It’s a place where wars are fought, elections are won, and terror is promoted. There are no regulations. It is a no man’s land.’”

Psy-Group was founded by Royi Burstien, an IDF intelligence officer who spent time working in an elite unit that specialized in psychological warfare. The owner of Psy-Group, Joel Zamel, was born in Russia, studied at an Israeli University where he received a Master’s in Government, Diplomacy, and Strategy, specializing in counter-terrorism. The corporate documents were filed in Cyprus, which helped Psy-group gain access to clientele more easily in Arab nations, which don’t work overtly with Israeli companies.’

Zamel would also forge close ties to many big names in the Republican establishment, such as Newt Gingrich and Project for the New American Century member Elliot Abrams. One of the operations undertaken by Psy-Group was given the title Project Butterfly and consisted of the private intelligence firm targeting anti-Israel campus protestors, specifically those of BDS, at the behest of the company’s wealthy Jewish-American donor clientele.

Once again from the New Yorker, “In early meetings with donors, in New York, Burstien said that the key to mounting an effective anti-B.D.S. campaign was to make it look as though Israel, and the Jewish-American community, had nothing to do with the effort. The goal of Butterfly, according to a 2017 company document, was to “destabilize and disrupt anti-Israel movements from within.” Psy-Group operatives scoured the Internet, social-media accounts, and the “deep” Web—areas of the Internet not indexed by search engines like Google—for derogatory information about B.D.S. activists. If a student claimed to be a pious Muslim, for example, Psy-Group operatives would look for photographs of him engaging in behavior unacceptable to many pious Muslims, such as drinking alcohol or having an affair. Psy-Group would then release the information online using avatars and websites that couldn’t be traced back to the company or its donors.”

Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater, arranged a meeting between himself, Joel Zamel, and Donald Trump Jr. at Trump Tower about how the company could use their skills in influence operations to help Trump secure the presidency. Zamel maintains that these discussions with Trump went nowhere, but Zamel’s associate George Nader’s representative claimed that Zamel boasted after the election that he ran a secret campaign that was influential in Trump’s victory, even going so far as to show Nader analytical reports detailing the success and use of bots, fake accounts, and disinformation in service of the Trump campaign. During the Russiagate probes in 2018, headed by Robert Mueller, the FBI gained an interest in Psy-Group, and Zamel decided to shut down the company.

To return to the Mukasey’s, who both served as fixers for white-collar criminals, going so far as to defend Epstein, private Israeli spy firms operating on US soil, and petitioning for the spy Jonathan Pollard’s release from prison, we can see how they learned, in conjunction with Giuliani, how to become fixers for the Epstein class.

Now to hone in on Giuliani, who casted doubt on the official narrative of Epstein’s ‘suicide,’ said, “It is inconceivable Epstein could have hung himself if there was a suicide Watch,” adding: “Follow the motives.”

Giuliani also said regarding Epstein’s trafficking case that it was, “obviously going to implicate a lot of people—I can’t tell you who, but it’s not going to end up with just Jeffrey Epstein.”

Despite his public tone, ever so carefully leaning into public scrutiny of Epstein, what Giuliani obviously failed to mention is his law firm, and even his own personal ties to the serial child molester and sex trafficker.

We have already stated that Epstein and Ghislaine at the very least received legal consultation from lawyers at Bracewell and Giuliani, but as tends to happen when digging into the ties of the most shady and crooked elites connected to Epstein, their is always more threads to unravel.

There is this email exchange between Ehud Barak and Epstein, which begins with Epstein asking Barak how Reporty Homeland Security was doing, the company that would go on to become Carbyne 911, which has been implemented in 9/11 and emergency call centers across the United States, giving the company the information of anyone who may dial during an emergency. The company, which will be discussed later, was founded by Ehud Barak and former Israeli Unit 8200 members and received funds from both Epstein and Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund. Barak responds that the CEO and the Business Development guy paid visits to the NYPD, Rudy Giuliani, and others with the quasi-round set to close on more than $4 million.

Epstein’s assistant Lesley Groff wrote in this email to Epstein that she spoke with Maureen at Giuliani’s office and that she was going to check with Giuliani about breakfast, but she thinks that breakfast might just work. Breakfast wouldn’t work, so Giuliani’s office suggested the initial 4:30 meeting at Giuliani’s office.

Lesley Groff emailed Bill Siegel, that Epstein preferred to meet with Giuliani over his partner, with Siegel replying that he would reach out to him.

While not definitive, it seems very probable, if not almost certain, that Giuliani had some sort of role in Epstein’s legal counsel and possibly defense. This makes perfect sense, given the mutual connections shared by the two men to people like Donald Trump, an associate and client of Giuliani.

Now let’s delve into Giuliani and his response to the attacks, his seeming foreknowledge, and some of the other oddities surrounding his behavior in relation to 9/11. Everyone should check out James Corbett of the Corbett Report’s video about the 9/11 suspects, with Rudy Giuliani being one of the people discussed in relation to the attacks. Also, Kevin Ryan’s chapter on Giuliani in his book Another Nineteen has been heavily drawn from in this section.

In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, under the guise of clearing a path for first responders, tons of dump trucks were filled with rubble from the WTC buildings, but this went far beyond clearing a path. This was the disposal of evidence from the largest crime in American history. And this was spearheaded by none other than Rudy Giuliani.

Donald Trump Commission on Terrorism and Rudy Giuliani Cover-Up of Evidence.

And while this destruction of evidence was done for the alleged purpose of clearing a pathway for first responders, many first responders felt that this went beyond the purported reasoning given by officials and that this was tantamount to the criminal destruction of evidence. Take, for instance, the firefighters belonging to Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, such as Erik Lawyer.

Fire Fighter Erik Lawyer Slams NIST And The 9/11 “Investigation”

And what was done with all of the debris that was taken from the scene of the crime under Giuliani’s watch? Well, much of it was sold at discount prices to the Chinese firm Baosteel. Human remains were found at the Fresh Kills landfill, where the rubble was sifted through, with one of the supervisors of the facility, who had sifted through the rubble, which was used to pave potholes in NYC, saying it had human remains left in it.

While some maintain that the rapid removal of debris from the site of the WTC was due to the government wanting to reopen Wall Street, which likely holds a degree of truth in it, the unprecedented rate of cleanup spearheaded by Giuliani and others holds another dimension to it. It also seems that there was an active effort by authorities to suppress any investigation into the debris for the use of explosives in the attacks.

In 2002, the US House Commitee on Science reported, “In the month that lapsed between the terrorist attacks and the deployment of the [FEMA] BPAT team, a significant amount of steel debris — including most of the steel from the upper floors — was removed from the rubble pile, cut into smaller sections, and either melted at the recycling plant or shipped out of the U.S.. Some of the critical pieces of steel — including the suspension trusses from the top of the towers and the internal support columns — were gone before the first BPAT team member ever reached the site.”

During the cleanup the site was strictly controlled with access to the site being highly limited and photographs being banned on orders of Giuliani. Much of the steel was sold as fast as possible to steel recyclers as stated in reference to Baosteel but a significant amount of it was sold to companies with mafia-links. Many of the sub-contractors responsible for the removal of the debris have been alleged to have connections to the Columbo and Luchese crime families. And one of the companies hired to remove debris from the cite AMEC used subcontractors with ties to the Luchese crime family and as Kevin Ryan writes in Another Nineteen, “At Ground Zero AMEC was led by its Vice Chairman, John Cavanagh, who had previously been the President and COO of Morse Diesel International, the predecessor to AMEC. Morse Diesel had also retrofitted WTC building 7 for Salomon Brothers in 1989. But at the time of the 9/11 attacks, Cavanagh reported to Peter Janson, the CEO of AMEC Construction and long-time business associate of Donald Rumsfeld. Under Janson’s leadership, AMEC had just completed a $258 million refurbishment of Wedge 1 of the Pentagon, exactly where American Airlines Flight 77 impacted the building.”

Oh, and this is where the DOD budget analyst office was, where people we’re working on the whereabouts of the missing $2.3 trillion dollars Donald Rumsfeld said was unaccounted for the day prior. The comptroller responsible for the money at the time was Dov Zakheim, who was a PNAC member who helped author the infamous Rebuilding America’s Defenses paper, which talks about “a new Pearl Harbor.”

Perhaps, these mafia connections shouldn’t come as a surprise, considering that Rudy Giuliani’s father served time in Sing Sing prison for felony assault and robbery, and after his stint in the pen would work as a loan shark enforcer for the mob. Giuliani’s uncle ran a loan shark and gambling operation with a made man. And Giuliani’s cousin was a ‘stone cold gangster’ who was killed by FBI agents after trying to hit them with his car.

Kevin Ryan writes in Another Nineteen, “The steel evidence, “a significant amount of which was quickly removed before investigators arrived, might have shown evidence of explosive damage, like metal “pedaling.” But the steel was not the only evidence that was removed. For example, the black boxes that contain the flight data recorders and cockpit data recorders on every airliner were officially never found for either American Airlines Flight 11 or United Airlines Flight 175. This claim came from the FBI and was supported by the 9/11 Commission Report, but was contradicted by a number of people who worked at the site. Two Ground Zero workers claimed that they helped authorities find three of the four black boxes in October 2001. One of them, New York City firefighter Nicholas DeMasi, described the recovery of the devices in a book. Additionally, a source from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said, “Off the record, we had the boxes. You’d have to get the official word from the FBI as to where they are, but we worked on them here.”

And while we are supposed to believe that the indestructible titanium constructed black boxes couldn’t be found amongst the rubble, yet the passport of alleged hijacker Satam al Suqami who was said to be aboard American Airlines Flight 11 which struck the North Tower was supposedly found amongst the rubble, meaning that it would have had to have survived the impact of the plane striking the north tower, the office furnishing fires, the collapse of the building, the smoldering rubble, and any thermitic materials possibly used in the attacks. However, while first reported to be found in the rubble, 9/11 Commission staff member Susan Ginberg would later say, “A passerby picked it up and gave it to a NYPD detective shortly before the World Trade Center towers collapsed.”

Kevin Ryan points out that this supposedly crucial piece of evidence would have been handled by NYPD Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik’s department.

Bernard Kerik also held ties to the world of organized crime. Kerik first met Giuliani in 1993 during Giuliani’s mayoral run and worked as his chauffeur and bodyguard. In August 2000, Giuliani appointed Kerik as the Police Commissioner. Prior to his appointment, Giuliani was briefed on Kerik’s alleged connections to a company involved with organized crime, and his appointment was opposed by half of his cabinet. Once again, Kevin Ryan writes, “Kerik’s connections to the mob were not a surprise to many people, because he was regularly embroiled in scandal. Bribery, tax fraud, and document falsification are only some of the crimes for which Kerik was accused. Finally, in October 2009, Kerik was sent to federal prison after a judge revoked his $500,000 bail and berated him publicly from the bench. The judge described Kerik as a “toxic combination of self-minded focus and arrogance.”

Now that we know a little about Kerik and his close relationship to Giuliani, as well as Giuliani’s role in the destruction of evidence and Kerik’s role in the handling of evidence and his department’s possible planting of the miracle passport, let’s delve into evidence that these two men, as well as some of their associates, seemed to have foreknowledge of the attacks.

Everyone Who’s Anyone is Late to Work on 9/11 (So they can go on the news and say Osama Bin Laden is responsible)

As part of the mayor’s office under Giuliani, in 1996, the Office of Emergency (OEM) was created, meant to run drills and exercises in preparation for an emergency, as well as responding to emergencies and helping facilitate communications between different agencies in the event that an emergency does take place. The OEM’s emergency operation center was housed on the 23rd floor of WTC 7, which was a controversial decision following the 1993 WTC attacks. The decision to place the Emergency Operation Center in the WTC was allegedly made by Jerome Hauer, the first director of the OEM, who had been appointed to the position by Giuliani.

For those of you who wish to learn more about Hauer’s more modern involvement in various shady things, I recommend everyone check out Whitney Webb’s work on Hauer on her website, Unlimited Hangout.

In 1999, when discussing what exactly Hauer’s job was, the New York Times wrote that it was, “sitting around all day thinking up horrifying ways for things to be destroyed and people to die.”

Hauer would describe his interest in certain times of emergencies to the publication with one of particular interest regarding 9/11. When speaking to the Times, Hauer, mentioning the types of emergencies he was concerned with, said, “helicopter crash, subway fire, water main break, ice storm, heat wave, blackout, building collapse, building collapse, building collapse.”

Hauer even kept trophies from building collapses he had responded to in the past.

After leaving the Giuliani-appointed position as director of the OEM in 2000, Hauer would get another job in the WTC center complex as the managing director of Kroll Inc., running the security for the buildings. Kroll has been called the “CIA of Wall Street’ due to their being essentially a private intelligence agency. The founder of Kroll Inc., Jules Kroll, routinely hired former CIA, Mossad, and MI6 employees.

An interesting aside, the New York Times reported in 1992, “When Kroll is not actively investigating an international cast of scoundrels, he has occasionally been hired by them. Two weeks before his mysterious death, the publishing tycoon Robert Maxwell summoned Kroll to his penthouse suite in the Helmsley Palace in Manhattan and asked him to investigate the “dark forces” he said were mobilizing against him -- “dark forces” that had nothing to do with the publisher’s increasingly suspicious creditors. At the time of his death, Maxwell was working on a list of possible adversaries -- a list that, apparently, has disappeared.”

And Jean-Luc Brunel, when soliciting Epstein for advice on money stolen from him, asks if he should hire a company like Kroll, with other mentions of Kroll existing in the emails.

To return to Hauer, who should have been in the WTC buildings during 9/11, given his job as the Managing Director of Kroll, would, instead of going to work, make television appearances announcing that the man responsible for the attacks was none other than Osama Bin Laden, as well as dismissing the notion that any kind of explosives had been used. Similar to Epstein’s best friend Ehud Barak, but even more flagrant, given that he worked in the WTC complex.

Dan Rather’s immediate interview of Jerome Hauer on 9/11, who dismisses Explosives inside the Twin Towers

Whitney Webb, in her article A Killer Enterprise: How One of Big Pharma’s Most Corrupt Companies Plans to Corner the COVID-19 Cure Market, writes, “Yet, not all Kroll employees were as lucky as Hauer. John O’Neil had just begun working for Kroll and was at the World Trade Center that day, dying in the attacks. O’Neil had previously worked with the FBI and was the country’s top expert on Osama bin Laden and his activities. He had resigned in mid-2001 after his investigations into bin Laden were repeatedly blocked by his superiors, something that happened to numerous federal investigators prior to 9/11, and was subsequently offered a job at Kroll by none other than Jerome Hauer himself.”

“Also on the day of 9/11, Hauer had told top Bush administration officials to start taking the antibiotic Cipro to prevent infection via anthrax, and Hauer would subsequently make public hints via mass media that foreign terrorists were working with Saddam Hussein to unleash an anthrax attack on the American public. All of this took place well before the first anthrax attack victim, photojournalist Robert Stevens, would even show symptoms.”

Much more, and I mean like so much more, could be said about Hauer, but that goes beyond the scope of this video.

In addition to Giuliani associate Hauer, Giuliani and Kerik displayed likely foreknowledge of the attacks as well.

When speaking to ABC news, Giuliani says that he was told that WTC 7 was going to fall prior to its collapse, “I .. I went down to the scene, and we set up a headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna’ collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit, got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.”

Giuliani was warned of the WTC Collapse.

Kevin Ryan writes in Another Nineteen, “Problems with this remark include that, at the time, no one familiar with structural fires or tall building construction expected anything of the kind. That is because no tall building had ever suffered global collapse from fire before, and, moreover, none have experienced such a failure since that day. In fact, many architects and engineers still consider it impossible.”

“In this same interview, Giuliani claimed that no one had ever predicted airliner crashes into the WTC, saying, “Oh, there’s no question we were all caught totally off balance. No one, no one, no one could possibly expect, uh, large airplanes to crash into the, you know, the World Trade Center, uh, the way this happened.” This stammering statement was not just unconvincing; it was patently false. Those in charge of securing the WTC in the decade before 9/11, specifically Brian Michael Jenkins of Kroll Associates, had considered exactly that scenario. Another person who worked with Jenkins at Kroll Associates was James R. Bucknam. Once a senior adviser to Louis Freeh, Bucknam had worked with Giuliani and Freeh in the offices of the SDNY during the time that Giuliani was investigating BCCI.”

And as we have already seen, the Giuliani associate tasked with the WTC complex’s security on the day of 9/11, a man who was obsessed with building collapse, conveniently was absent from work to be possibly the first person to promote what would soon become the official narrative.

Why was Rudy’s Command Center on 9/11 a truck?

So why were people like Giuliani operating out of a truck on the day of 9/11 instead of their $13 million emergency command center designed for just such a scenario with its bulletproof, reinforced, bomb resistant walls?

Barry Jennings WTC 7 (Explosions) Interview - building 7

We can also see that OEM staff had foreknowledge of the attacks, with an Emergency Medical Technician at the scene saying, “OEM says the buildings are going to collapse; we need to get out,” and “I was just at OEM. The message I was given was that the buildings are going to collapse; we need to get our people out.”

The OEM Deputy Director and an unidentified individual said, “It was brought to my attention that it was believed that the structural damage that was suffered to the towers was quite significant, and they were very confident that the building’s stability was compromised, and they felt that the north tower was in danger of a near-imminent collapse.”

After the planes hit the towers, Kerick and Giuliani were meandering around the WTC site with Fire Marshal Steven Mosiello, saying, “At that point, the Mayor shows up. I was standing away from the command post, and the Mayor showed up… I remember the Mayor being with Commissioner Kerik and himself and a lot of their aides and escorts or whatever.”

However, by the time of the South Towers collapse, both had moved away to safety. Kerik and Giuliani seemed to have been conjoined at the hip on that fateful day, with Kerik seemingly instructing Giuliani when the press was near and answering questions on his behalf. And from what I can tell, Kerik was the first to make a government pronouncement that no explosives had been used in the attacks.

Kerik worked at Giuliani’s firm, Giuliani Partners, from December 2001 to December 2004, with a brief absence when he was tapped by the Bush administration to be the Minister of the Interior for Iraq, also working as the Senior Policy Advisor to L. Paul Bremer.

Ryan writes, “Kerik’s later work in Iraq was widely recognized as a dismal failure. By the time his remarkably short assignment was over, he had offended the U.S. military and left the newly forming Iraqi police force in shambles. General Ricardo Sanchez, the top military leader in Iraq during that time, said that Kerik focused more on “conducting raids and liberating prostitutes” than training the Iraqis.[46] It seemed that only one person was impressed with “The Baghdad Terminator,” as Kerik was called during his three months in Iraq, and that one supporter was Donald Rumsfeld. For some reason, Rumsfeld’s perspective on Kerik’s performance seemed biased. “Since Bernie Kerik left,” Rumsfeld complained, “I understand things have slowed down on police training.”

Paul Bremer worked as the CEO of Marsh Crisis Consulting, a subsidiary of Marsh and McLennan, which housed its offices in the North Tower. And maybe not so coincidentally, just hours after the attacks, he would appear on MSNBC to announce that the attacks were carried out by Osama Bin Laden. Bremer and 1,700 other employees of Marsh had offices in the North Tower from floors 93 to 100, the exact area of the collision. 294 of Marsh’s employees would die in the attacks. One lucky survivor who just so happened to be running late due to traffic turned into a 9/11 whistleblower, that being Richard Groves, who exposed the link between the company AIG and Marsh, which used software called Silverstream to possibly funnel money through the WTC during the 9/11 attacks, allowing people with foreknowledge to profit, but once again, that is beyond the scope of our current discussion.

Bremer on MSNBC

And just before moving on from the Giuliani section, it should be mentioned that Giuliani, when he worked in the Justice Department, chaired a committee intended to provide oversight for the use of PROMIS software—the Israeli bugged software that Ghislaine’s father, Robert Maxwell, sold—which perhaps there wasn’t quite enough oversight.

Giuliani’s colleague, Peter Videnieks, illegally distributed enhanced PROMIS software to foreign companies that he, among others, was involved in a network involving PROMIS, BCCI, and other entities and individuals that comprise the Iran-Contra network.

Interestingly enough, Giuliani would be tasked with prosecuting BCCI after being appointed as the US Attorney for the SDNY. We don’t have the time or, at least, I do not have the will to explain the BCCI scandal and Danny Casalero’s investigation here, but we will just say it involves laundering drug money, financial crimes, sex trafficking, and the funding of terrorism. Giuliani, after his time at the SDNY, would go on to work for the firm White & Case, which represented BCCI. And remember how Epstein’s Iran-Contra error mentor, Adnan Khashoggi, was wrapped up with BCCI? I’m not trying to play seven degrees of Kevin Bacon (or should I say one degree of Jeffrey Epstein), but I do think it was worthy of mentioning.

JFK Disinfo Agent Invites Ghislaine to the 9/11 Shadow Commission

Of course, we have to mention Ghislaine Maxwell being invited to the 9/11 shadow commission by Edward Jay Epstein, a JFK disinfo agent who spread the anti-Soviet propaganda of the CIA’s James Angleton, who was also the CIA liaison to Israel. Epstein argued in his work on the assassination of JFK that Oswald was a KGB agent. He relied heavily on ‘information’ given to him by James Angleton, with the two having many conversations. Angleton was a master of deception, and possibly Epstein got lost in the ‘wilderness of mirrors’ created by Angleton. However, he was possibly a disinformation agent, a mockingbird media type of figure. It is interesting to note that when interviewing George De Morenschildt, one of Oswald’s many connections to the CIA, with De Morenschildt being a CIA asset, Epstein offered De Morenschildt $4,000 because De Morenschildt was low on money. De Morenschildt was understandably paranoid towards the end of his life due to what he knew. Epstein and De Morenschildt broke for lunch and were set to resume their discussion at 3pm, with De Morenschildt returning to his home and supposedly committing suicide later that day.

Epstein’s diary entry reads, “David Bludworth, The State’s Attorney, was a folksy, charming, and savvy interrogator. He began by telling me that De Mohrenschildt had put a shotgun in his mouth and killed himself at 3:45 p.m. There were no witnesses - and no one home at the time of the shooting. The precise time of his death was established by a tape recorder, left running that afternoon to record the soap operas for the absent Mrs. Tilton, and which recorded a single set of footfalls in the room and the blast of the shotgun, which was found on the Persian carpet next to him. No suicide note or other clue was found. He said I was probably the last person to talk to him. Then, he asked whether I had in my possession De Mohrenschildt’s black address book. I replied, “No.” He politely rephrased the question and asked me again, about a half-dozen times, whether I had the black book.”

Edward Jay Epstein hosted on his website information regarding the Shadow Commission he was forming which could be interpreted by someone concerned with American, Israeli, and insider involvement in the 9/11 attacks as being a propaganda effort to take people critical of the official 9/11 story and steer them into a direction safer for elites much like his work on JFK steered attention away from the CIA and conveniently onto the great boogeyman of CIA men like Angleton, that of course being the Soviet Union.

Ghislaine Maxwell, in a separate email, is asked by a woman named Amanda if she had been in flight school with any of the terrorists. Ghislaine was in flight school in Florida during the period of time when some of the hijackers were.

It is also interesting to note that Ghislaine Maxwell was in New York during the time of the 9/11 attacks.

An Epstein Associate with Ties to the “Dancing Israelis

Now, let’s look at some Epstein associates who, like Giuliani, were involved with the cover-up of what truly took place on 9/11, with the first of these being Alan Dershowitz. Now, many of you are familiar with the “Dancing Israelis”, but for those of you who aren’t, on the morning of 9/11, three men were spotted seated on top of a moving van at 8:46 AM, minutes after the first plane struck the WTC, taking pictures of the towers, laughing, and celebrating. After being spotted, they fled the scene, and the FBI put out an all-points bulletin for officers to look for a white van with Urban Moving Systems on its side. Later on at 3:56 PM, the van was pulled over, and five men were inside: Sivan Kurzberg and his brother, Paul, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, and Omar Marmari.

The Five Dancing Israelis - 9/11/2001 - Our Purpose Was To Document The Event

Dan Rather on Letterman Dancing Israelis

Dancing Israelis Conspiracy

Kurzberg, according to the police report, told the officers, “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.”

Despite the men telling police an innocent explanation for their behavior that day, when the photographs were developed, what was revealed was that the men were indeed celebrating, laughing, high-fiving, and Sivan Kurzberg was even photographed holding up a lighter to the flame engulfed WTC building in the background.

The FBI confirmed that two of the men had ties to Israeli intelligence and believed them to be working on some kind of Mossad operation. One of them had $4,600 in his sock, and the men had plane tickets for various places around the globe for their immediate departure. FBI reports show the men making contradictory statements to investigators. The men were held in federal custody for 71 days, then deported back to Israel. The owner of Urban Moving Systems, Dominik Sueter, was questioned by the FBI, with the agency concluding that “Urban Moving may have been providing cover for an Israeli intelligence operation”.

When investigators returned to question Sueter, they found that he had hastily fled to Israel.

What conclusions did the FBI supposedly draw from their investigation? Well, they thought they were likely Israeli intelligence, but don’t worry, they think their target was not the US but rather studying Islamic Groups and Charities with potential ties to terrorist networks.

‘The White Van’ ABC News 20/20 Preview on Urban Moving Systems and 9/11 Hi-Fivers (Dancing Israelis)

Later on, on Israeli television, where the men were being interviewed, Odded Ellner said they were there to document the event, which seems like an admission of foreknowledge.

Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9/11

Now, how does any of this pertain to Epstein?

Well, apparently it was none other than Epstein associate Alan Dershowitz who stepped in as a negotiator on behalf of the men when they were being held in federal custody in order to smooth things over with the U.S. Government, as Christopher Ketcham reported in CounterPunch.

As pointed out by my friend Parapower Mapping in his recent series of articles, Dershowitz advised Epstein’s mentor Adnan Khashoggi, represented Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard during one of his appeals, and in NY Magazine, unintentionally revealed that Epstein had met with a certain Prince Bandar in 1999, with Dershowitz later clarifying that it was not the Saudi Prince and Former Head of Saudi Military Intelligence. Alan Dershowitz, as most of you already know, helped Epstein get the sweetheart deal, had correspondence with Epstein all the way through 2019, the year of Epstein’s ‘suicide’, and Epstein victims Sarah Ransome, Maria Farmer, and Virginia Giuffre have all leveled accusations against Dershowitz. Dershowitz obviously denies the rape allegations.

The Ghost of PROMIS Lives in the 9/11 Machine

Now, let’s briefly cover another person who could potentially have been involved in the cover-up of 9/11 with connections to the Epstein circle. Michael Chertoff was appointed by George W. Bush to head the criminal division of the Department of Justice in 2001, and on the day of 9/11, he was the most senior DOJ official on duty at the FBI command center following the 9/11 attacks. Chertoff would later lead federal prosecutions against Zacarias Moussaoui, who likely planned to participate in 9/11. Prior to 9/11, Chertoff represented a New Jersey doctor who was accused of running an HMO that was funded by Osama Bin Laden, with money being taken from the HMO and used to fund Al-Qaeda. Michael Chertoff was this doctor’s lawyer. Chertoff has also been accused by some of sabotaging the investigation of Ptech, a company that had numerous investors and managers with ties to terrorists, with whistleblower Andrea Singh claiming the company was a CIA front. The software Ptech made was purchased by the CIA, FBI, the Department of Energy, the Air Force, the Navy, the FAA, and other agencies. Some have theorized that the software could have potentially been used to pull off 9/11.

Chertoff would go on to sit on the Board of Carbyne911, which, as we have discussed in previous videos, was emergency response software installed by various emergency call centers across the US. The software is able to steal all kinds of sensitive data from your phone when you make a 911 call. Chertoff sat on the board with Epstein associates Ehud Barak and Nicole Junnkermann, along with Unit 8200 members. Carbyne was funded by Epstein and Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund.

Michael Bloomberg, the man who succeeded Giuliani as Mayor of New York, downplayed the toxicity of the dust from the asbestos-ridden WTC buildings. Bloomberg received criticism after saying that deceased police detective Jimmy Zadroga, who spent more than 400 hours working at ground zero following 9/11, was “not a hero” since his death was ruled as unrelated to the toxic debris. Zadroga died at 34, and a New Jersey medical examiner ruled that his fatal pulmonary disease was a result of the dust. Bloomberg was involved with the rebuilding of the WTC, having a tense relationship with Larry Silverstein.

Bloomberg has ties to not only Epstein but also Ghislaine Maxwell, Les Wexner, and Harvey Weinstein. Bloomberg’s name appears in Epstein’s black book; he was photographed at a party with Ghislaine, he attended parties with Wexner, and a firm he had a $136 million stake in called Sycamore Partners bought Leslie Wexner’s controlling stake in Victoria’s Secret.

Ghislaine’s sister Christine Maxwell co-founded Chiliad software with two other people, with one of them being CIA man Alan Wade. The software can take data from different agencies and depositories, helping in investigations. Many people think that this software was an outgrowth of PROMIS software, which Robert Maxwell sold to US government agencies, including those involved with the production of nuclear weapons, and Christine worked for the front company Robert Maxwell sold it through. Due to the Inslaw case with Bill Hamilton, the founder of Inslaw, saying the government stole his software, PROMIS could no longer be used, and the US government was looking for a successor to PROMIS that was different enough to avoid any potential litigation or legal troubles. So all things point to Chiliad being this repackaged version of PROMIS.

After 9/11, Chiliad was in high demand and was used in the FBI’s counterterrorism data warehouse and was used in the FBI’s investigation into money laundering in relation to 9/11.

More Threads Run Across the Cork Board

David Rubenstein, the co-owner of the Carlyle Group, of which much more could be said, but will not be due to the length of this article, would have a meeting with Epstein after being introduced to each other through Boris Nikolic. The Carlyle Group had a conference in the Ritz Carlton on 9/11, attended by former president and CIA director George H. W. Bush and Osama Bin Laden’s brother. Presumably, Rubenstein was there.

Now let’s move to Zim Shipping. Zim Shipping has long been of interest to people who believe that 9/11 was an Israeli job. Zim Shipping, an Israeli company headed by Eyal and Idan Ofer, occupied the 16th and 17th floors of WTC 1 with 200 employees. Zim completed its move only a week before the attacks took place, but in the interest of fairness, Zim had announced their plan to relocate the previous April. Both of the Ofer brothers had ties to Epstein. Epstein rode on a plane with Zim Shipping chairman Idan Ofer, who approached Epstein about bailing out the company in 2009, as shown by researcher Parapower Mapping. There are multiple mentions of the Ofers in the emails. Epstein was also at a meeting with Eyal Ofer. Epstein refers to one of the Ofers as an arrogant Israeli when asking Steven Sinofsky if he had time for a meeting concerning Ofer. David Stern inquires with Epstein about setting up Idan Ofer with Karim, presumably Epstein’s associate Karim, who is the son of the president of Senegal, involving resource investments in Africa.

Both the Epstein Victim’s Compensation Fund and the 9/11 Victim’s Compensation Fund was ran by Jordana Feldman.

Finally, Cybersecurity, Law Enforcement, and Intelligence Analyst Morgan Wright has discussed how Epstein allegedly worked to block the lawsuits of the families of 9/11. In an email to Raafat Alsabbagh, Epstein says to have Kathy Ruemmler, an attorney and former White House Counsel to Obama, along with Ken Starr, most famous for authoring the Starr Report which sought the impeachment of Bill Clinton, to help in this endeavor. Then he says to file an action asking if JASTA or Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism is constitutional, and that this will tie up things for 5-10 years in order to deny families reparations.

The connections of those in Epstein’s circle to the tragic events of 9/11 are undeniable and overwhelming. All of this only leaves one question: Did Epstein know as much and was he as involved in the cover-up and possibly attacks as some of his closest friends?

Correction: In the original post I mistakenly said the scene from The Medusa Touch was set in New York, but it is actually London. The article has been updated after this has been brought to my attention.

I also said in relation to Epstein’s investment in Valar Ventures, that he “donated” instead of “invested” and mistakenly wrote “ Valor” instead of “Valar”.

Forgive me for my mistakes. - Sigh Ops

PART I: Nabokov, Lolita, and the CIA’s Cultural War

Epstein’s Favorite Novel

The CIA Promotion of Lolita

The Pedophile Stanford Professor Who Birthed the “Nymphet”

Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta. She was Lo, plain Lo, in the morning, standing four feet ten in one sock. She was Lola in slacks. She was Dolly at school. She was Dolores on the dotted line. But in my arms she was always Lolita.

These words which open Vladimir Nabokov’s novel Lolita are inked on the bare skin of a young woman in the Epstein files, on her cleavage, foot, hip, on her neck, and along her spine.

Multiple outlets have reported on Epstein’s fascination with the novel Lolita. The novel’s plot details the kidnapping and serial molestation of a 12-year-old girl by a narrator who identifies himself under the pseudonym Humbert Humbert. During the raid on Epstein’s Palm Beach home, a first edition copy of Lolita was found on his nightstand, the way a Baptist keeps a King James Bible beside his bed. Currently, a first edition copy can fetch anywhere between $5,000 and $25,000.

There’s an email exchange with a girl named Diana who tells Epstein that “Lolita is in New York”, in the context of whether a certain girl in town was willing to give Epstein a massage. Epstein created a Google Calendar reminder to himself to call “Lolita”. In the emails, Epstein frequently recommends the book to others. He’s insistent that one has to read the annotated Lolita to fully comprehend the novel.

One of these mentions of Lolita is, after a redacted individual said she “played sex slave with the Sasha Grey guy” and that it was the first time she was “properly fucked”. Sasha Grey is a prolific hardcore porn actress. One can read the rest of the email exchange for more lurid details. Epstein received an email with the heading “Lolita photos from Diana.”

An email sent from a redacted individual to Epstein which discusses finding assistants for the sex trafficker is followed by, “so you could do what you want with them..hmm..my dangerous Jeffrey ;)” and goes on to quote this passage from Lolita, “for there is nothing more conservative than a child, especially a girl-child, be she the most auburn and russet, the most mythopoeic nymphet in October’s orchard-haze.”

If you search “Lolita” on the Jmail website, you will get 168 email results.

This article explores how US intelligence and organized crime helped facilitate the transformation of the Lolita character from Nabokov’s novel into the sexualized Lolita archetype of today. The Lolita archetype of the hypersexualized child whom men can’t resist would later be promoted through the fashion industry by Epstein, Wexner, and others. Many of the men responsible for the creation of this Lolita archetype were participants in what Whitney Webb in her two-volume book One Nation Under Blackmail, has deemed “The sordid union between Intelligence and Organized Crime that gave rise to Jeffery Epstein”.

The biographical details of Vladimir Nabokov show that from birth, he was no ordinary individual, given his pedigree. Nabokov was born to Russian nobility on April 22, 1899. His father was a liberal lawyer, statesman, and journalist. His mother was the heiress of a millionaire gold mine owner. His grandfather was the Justice Minister during the reign of Alexander II. His grandmother was a Baltic German Baroness.

Nabokov’s Uncle whom Nabokov referred to as Uncle Ruka, was a Russian Diplomat who had an unusual and potentially inappropriate relationship with Nabokov, with mentions of fondling and tickling occurring in Nabokov’s autobiography Speak, Memory. Scholars have discussed Nabokov’s borderline obsession with abuse and pedophilia, with these being recurring subjects that appear in his writing, and have speculated as to whether Nabokov may have been molested by Uncle Ruka. No definitive answers exist to this question.

Nabokov’s cousin was a composer and the Secretary General of the Congress for Cultural Freedom (CCF), a CIA front. Nicolas Nabokov was effectively the “cultural generalissimo” of the anti-Communist West, using CIA funds to organize high-profile arts festivals and journals to combat Soviet propaganda. Vladimir would benefit from this, with some of his work being published in CCF journals like Encounter. The CIA-funded magazine also published an article discussing Lolita and the controversy surrounding the novel. Encounter was associated with the anti-Stalinist left and was co-founded by Irving Kristol, who would go on to become the “godfather of neoconservatism”. After the dissolution of the CCF, Nicolas became the resident composer of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, which some of you veteran parapolitical researchers are likely familiar with.

Vladimir Nabokov would actually secure a visa to come to America through the daughter of Leo Tolstoy Alexandra who was the head of the Tolstoy Foundation which received funding from the CIA with Frances Stonor Saunders writing in The Cultural Cold War, “Other members of the Tolstoy family were in regular contact with the Psychological Strategy Board in the early 1950s, and received funds from the CIA for their Munich-based Tolstoy Foundation.” Alexandra also corresponded with former CIA Director Allen Dulles.

Nabokov was hired at Stanford in 1941 by Professor Henry Lanz, the founder of Stanford’s Slavic Department. The university would not fund Nabokov’s position, so Lanz paid Nabokov’s salary out of his own pocket. Slavic research was of interest to the OSS (the precursor to the CIA) during WWII, leading to many researchers being recruited by the agency. One of the founders of Stanford’s Russian, Slavic, Eastern European, and Byzantine Studies department, Wayne Vucinich, worked for the OSS and would, after the end of World War II, begin his work at Stanford, where he would remain until 1978. While there is no proof that Lanz ever worked for the OSS, other biographical details give one reason to wonder about possible intelligence ties.

At the beginning of the First World War, Lanz would attempt to join the English, American, and Russian armies. He’d be denied by all three, but eventually landed a gig teaching English to American soldiers of Slavic descent at Camp Fremont in Menlo Park.

Not only did Lanz have a close relationship with Nabokov, but he was also a friend of Boris Pasternak, the author of Doctor Zhivago, which was banned by the Soviet Union in 1957 due to its anti-revolutionary themes. In an effort to undermine the Soviet Union, the CIA, in what was coined Project AEDINOSAUR, published the first Russian-language edition of the novel in the Netherlands and distributed it to Russian citizens during the 1958 Brussels World’s Fair. The CIA was successful in securing the Nobel Prize in Literature for Pasternak, which was viewed to be a diplomatic blow to the Soviet Union.

While Doctor Zhivago is the most well-known example of literature promoted by the CIA in an effort to undermine the Soviet Union, Nabokov’s Lolita was also promoted. George Minden was the President of the International Literary Center, which tried to win “influential friends” by distributing works of literature to academics in communist countries, with Nabokov being one of these authors whose work was distributed behind the Iron Curtain. Minden would later go on to become the Head of the Romanian Desk of Free Europe Press, an affiliate of Radio Free Europe, which was secretly funded, managed, and controlled by the CIA.

Whether it be his time at Camp Fremont, his role in the Slavic Department of Stanford, or his connections to influential Russians, there are many reasons why one might wonder as to whether or not Lanz had ever been recruited by intelligence. And, it might be Lanz who served as the inspiration for the pedophile narrator of Lolita.

Nabokov and Lanz formed a close relationship, playing more than 200 games of chess together. During one of these games, Lanz would admit to leading a double life. His dark secret? Lanz confessed to Nabokov that he was obsessed with young girls whom he called “nymphetes”, a word that he coined which would later be popularized by Nabokov’s novel Lolita. Lanz said that he had his wife dress up as a little girl and that on the weekends, he would travel to the countryside to participate in orgies with “nymphetes.” Lanz married his wife, the daughter of a friend, when she was 14, and he was in his late twenties.

Nabokov would say when the question was put to him as to whether Lanz was the inspiration for Humbert, “No, no, no. I may have had him in the back of my mind.”

The nymphet slipped out of the novel and into the limelight. Above tilted heart-shaped glasses, her eyes gaze back into us from the silver screen.

​

PART II: Kubrick, The Rape of Sue Lyons, and The Creation of the Lolita Archetype

The Army Propaganda to Hollywood Pipeline

The Destruction of a Child Star

Seven Arts Productions, Organized Crime, and the CIA

Mansions, Masks, Monarch, and Eyes Wide Shut

In 1962, Kubrick’s adaptation of Lolita was released to much controversy. While many today would find it rather tame for the subject matter addressed, the public at the time found it rather tawdry. However, it is the secret history behind this film, often unknown or neglected, which is truly lurid.

James B. Harris secured the rights to Lolita and partnered with Kubrick to form Harris-Kubrick Pictures. Harris was fresh out of the Army. He had been drafted into the U.S. Army Signal Corps in 1950, working there during the Korean War period. The Signal Corps was involved with Psychological Warfare, Propaganda, Combat Photography, and Military Coding in addition to managing communication networks and signal intelligence. Harris was stationed at Astoria Studios in Long Island. Astoria studios had previously belonged to Paramount Studios, but after the company moved the entirety of their studio productions to California, the studio would, in 1942, fall under the control of the United States Army Signal Corps Army Pictorial Services. It was at Astoria where recruitment and propaganda films meant to increase support for the war were filmed. Astoria was also where Harris would learn about film. It was during his time in the army that Kubrick and Harris would meet. It was also at Astoria that Harris would meet Alexander Singer, who would go on to be an early Kubrick collaborator.

Sue Lyon would star as Lolita in the film adaptation, which was directed by Kubrick and produced by Harris.

Michelle Phillips, the co-founder of The Mamas and The Papas, said that when visiting Sue Lyon, she found her “completely changed” and that Lyon proceeded to divulge her secret, that she lost her virginity to James B. Harris. Harris was 32, and Lyon was 14. Phillips went on to say, “I saw a picture of him. He looked like her grandfather.”

While never confirming this allegation, Lyon would later say of the film, “My destruction as a person dates from that film. Lolita exposed me to temptations no girl of that age should undergo. I defy any pretty girl who is rocketed to stardom at 14 in a sex nymphet role to stay on a level path thereafter.”

In an article entitled The Dark Side of Lolita the author Sarah Weinman writes, “Jim Maxwell, best man at Lyon’s wedding to her first husband, Hampton Fancher, had a slightly different version of the story. Maxwell, who worked as a carpenter at the time, told me—unprompted—that there was a relationship between Lyon and the Lolita producer, and that Lyon told him that Harris was her first lover. ‘It was, to say the least, an interesting revelation,’ Maxwell said he found out in the summer of 1965. ‘We were discussing her career. And she mentioned that after the release of Lolita, she went on a national tour with Jim [Harris], and that during the tour, they had sex.’ It was Maxwell’s impression that Harris took up with Lyon, sexually, sometime in the summer of 1962, after Lolita’s New York and Hollywood premieres.”

Kubrick and Harris would sexualize Lyon and keep her from doing any press related to the film in order to create the “Lolita image”.

The sexualization of Sue Lyon is a direct inversion of what Nabokov had tried to do with his novel. When discussing with the publisher of Lolita, possible covers, Nabokov would say, “There is one subject which I am emphatically opposed to: any kind of representation of a little girl.”

The novel is written in first-person from the perspective of the pedophile Humbert, but the reader is supposed to deduce that he is not a reliable narrator, noticing the difference between the reality of the events being described and the justifications and distortions that arise from Humbert’s pedophilic vantage point. The reader is supposed to see Dolores Haze while noticing the difference between Dolores and Lolita (the Spanish diminutive for Dolores), the nickname given to Dolores by Humbert. The intentional decision to sexualize Lyon, and as we will see it was intentional, shows that Kubrick and Harris turned their back on the meaning of Nabokov’s novel and embraced the vision of Humbert Humbert, converting the pedophilic gaze of Lolita’s unreliable narrator into a consumable fantasy.

Harris wrote to Vera Nabokov, “We are making an effort to introduce Sue Lyon to the world, but only through photographs, the shooting of which is completely controlled by Stanley and myself. [...] we are also trying to create the “Lolita image” about the girl, and this would immediately be destroyed by interviews which would reveal her as being completely opposite in real life to the character.”

How this was achieved is described in The Problems with Lolita, “This transformation of Lyon was controlled throughout by powerful men in Hollywood. A key part of it involved the Bert Stern photoshoot, organised by Harris and Kubrick. The photographs, taken at Sag Harbour in 1961, involved Lyon being dressed in only a blue bikini, wearing heart-shaped sunglasses, and sucking a lollipop, or in other images, lying on a bed in only her underwear and white nightgown. As Ritzenhoff has argued, ‘Stern created a visual vocabulary of teenage female sensuality in which Lolita is predominantly engaging with the viewer behind the camera, satisfying voyeuristic pleasure, which is echoed in Kubrick’s films. Stern’s promotional photography, therefore, was more representative of male power than female empowerment.’ Stern himself had a controversial history. He met his own future wife, Laumeister Stern, when she was just 13 and he was 53, and described her as his ‘fey-like blond child-girl ‘pubescent nymphet.’ In later life, he discussed how he became obsessed with the subjects that he was photographing, describing himself as a ‘voyeur’: ‘We are obsessed with possession. We want to OWN the thing, or the person we photograph. It’s not as aggressive as rape, and there is a style to it that no lowlife punk can appreciate, but still, we are in the inner sanctum of our devious, perverted, refracted minds, Humbert Humberts.’”

Interestingly, Bert Stern, the son of a child’s portrait photographer, was in the US Army photographic department.

Harris said, according to Stanley Kubrick: A Biography, “We knew we must make her (Lyon) a sex object. She can’t be childlike. If we made her a sex object, where everyone in the audience could understand why everyone would want to jump on her, and you make him attractive, it’s gonna work.”

In a separate interview Harris said, “We never mentioned the fact that Humbert had any feelings about young girls from the very beginning; it’s just coming in contact with this one, Lolita—who, we made sure when we cast her that she was a definite sex object, not something that could be interpreted as being perverted.”

Harris would also say in this interview, “I always felt—and when I told this to Stanley he immediately said I was right—is that since we were trying to make this film, basically, a bizarre love story, we felt that all of the best love stories revolve around the inability of the participants to get together. In the old days, like Romeo and Juliet, it was the class system, then there’s the religious differences and racial differences… all of those had been explored and done before, but there haven’t been any conflict in terms of age, and so we wanted to make this a love story where the main conflict was the age difference and we wanted it to come off as a love story and we feel very sympathetic with Humbert, and so we felt that we couldn’t end the picture on what would be a comedic scene, which is the killing of Clare Quilty.”

The nymphet adorns the glossy covers of magazines. Her glow is complemented by the movie posters’ sheen.

It was through independent film production company Seven Arts Productions that Humbert’s pedophilic gaze became the lens through which Lolita was interpreted. And as we will see, the Lolita archetype created by Stanley Kubrick and an alleged rapist producer with likely experience in producing military propaganda was bankrolled by a production company with ties to both the world of organized crime and the CIA.

Seven Arts Productions originated from Associated Artist Productions whose primary shareholder was Lou Chesler who had deep-connections to the world of organized crime through Meyer Lansky’s gambling operations. Chesler had a business relationship with John Pullman, who funneled mafia money through the Swiss Banque de Crédit International. Whitney Webb, in the first volume of One Nation Under Blackmail, cites Pullman as a board member. The bank was co-founded by Tibor Rosenbaum. Rosenbaum financed arms purchases for Israel through BCI and moved money for the Mossad and the Israeli Ministry of Defense through the bank.

These are not the only ties to organized crime held by Chesler, the man whose company produced Lolita, the movie which seeded into the public consciousness the archetype of the hypersexualized nymphet that men can’t resist. We will also see the CIA coming into this web of intrigue surrounding the film.

As of 1966, the third largest shareholder of Seven Arts Productions was the Winfield-Baird organization, a foundation that worked as a financial agent for the CIA’s International Organizations division. The company who bankrolled Lolita, the film that inverted the meaning of Nabokov’s novel and created the Lolita archetype, was itself bankrolled by organized crime and the CIA.

Chesler co-founded Grand Bahama Development Co. One of his business partners was future CIA advisor Wallace Groves. After Castro came to power, shutting down gambling operations, the mafia, through men like Chesler, moved their gambling operations to the Bahamas.

In his series Overworld: The Marriage of Crime and Capital, researcher Peter Grant has documented Chesler’s connections to the Mary Carter Paint Company and Resorts International which was a CIA front which, for a brief period, was controlled by none other than Epstein-associate Donald Trump.

So to summarize this convoluted thread, the 1962 adaptation of Lolita, that created the Lolita archetype, was produced by an alleged statutory rapist who got his start in film by likely helping make propaganda for the military. The photographer who met his wife when she was 13 and he was 53, the man responsible for the iconic photographs of Sue Lyon, also got his start as a military photographer. The production company that bankrolled Kubrick’s film was in part owned by Meyer Lansky’s accomplice Lou Chesler. This same production company’s third-largest shareholder worked as a financial agent for the CIA.

The nymphet thrives in that glorious space where power and vice entwine.

Kubrick is famous for his careful use of symbolism, and much debate has centered around potential coded messages in his films. In his adaptation of Lolita, Clare Quilty, played by Peter Sellers, is a high society man and famous playwright with “mysterious friends” and a penchant for costumes and masks. Quilty throws parties for his high-class friends at his mansion. Quilty seems to be everywhere and nowhere. In the film a disguised Quilty stalks Dolores and Humbert. Quilty convinces Dolores to leave Humbert after promising her a Hollywood contract. Dolores goes on to refuse to act in Quilty’s “art films”. This is all interesting in light of what we know about Henry Lanz, the possible inspiration for the Quilty archetype.

Kubrick’s later film Eyes Wide Shut, depicts elite sex parties involving deviance and occult ritual. In Eyes Wide Shut, we see the return of a mansion, masks, and elite sexual deviance which was depicted more subtly in Lolita. Famous in conspiracy circles, the location where the elite sex parties in Eyes Wide Shut were filmed was Mentmore Towers in Buckinghamshire, which was built between 1852 and 1854 for Baron Mayer De Rothschild with the intentions of being both a country home and a place to display and house some of the family’s fine art collection.

Kubrick was not the only one to adapt Lolita.

Adrian Lyne who directed many films with Jacob’s Ladder being one of significance to the parapolitical world, directed the 1997 Lolita. Due to there being no Hay’s Code, Lyne was able to be more faithful to the source material ultimately making a more overt and darker film. Dominique Swain was 15 when cast to play Dolores or as Humber affectionately refers to her as Lolita. Jeremy Irons who played Humbert was 48 to 49 years old during the filming. However, Hollywood has a long history of sexualizing children going back to Shirley Temple. There is Thora Birch who was 16 when appearing topless in American Beauty due to both of her porn star parents granting permission for this. There is the even more egregious case of Brooke Shields whose mother allowed for her to pose in Playboy at 10 years of age. Shields would go on to appear topless in the film Pretty Baby at 11. Shields was in the provocative Blue Lagoon at 14. Films like American Beauty and the 1997 Lolita show that the Lolita archetype had taken on a life of its own.

The nymphet now travels from red carpet to runway, enticing all with her splendid demoniac charm.

​

PART III: Epstein, Modeling, and The Lolitafication of Society

Epstein, Wexner, and the Many Secrets of Victoria’s Secret

Abercrombie and Fitch’s Softcore Porno Rag

Elite Models, Trump, Brunel, and Global Sex Trafficking

Lingerie for Little Girls at Limited Too and the Commodification of Innocence

Epstein, as stated in my previous overview of the Epstein scandal, was close to Les Wexner, the owner of The Limited, and was given power of attorney over Wexner’s vast estate. The Limited hosted a number of companies with those most prescient to our study in the Lolitafication of culture, being Victoria’s Secret, Abercrombie and Fitch, and Limited Too.

So let’s take it one company at a time.

Abercrombie and Fitch’s Softcore Porno Marketing and Sex Trafficking Allegations

The CEO of Abercrombie and Fitch from 1992 to 2014, Mike Jeffries, was hired by Les Wexner to reinvigorate the brand. Jeffries would, in part, accomplish this through hypersexualized marketing. In 2023, the BBC concluded a two year-long investigation into sexual assault allegations against Jeffries. Within a few weeks of the report being publicized, Abercrombie and Fitch had a civil class action complaint of sex trafficking filed against them by a former model. Jeffries and his boyfriend, Matthew Smith, were indicted on criminal charges of sex trafficking and interstate prostitution. Jeffries was released on $10 million bail. He pleaded not guilty at his arraignment, and in April of 2025, a motion was put forward that he was unfit to stand trial due to Alzheimer’s and Lewy Body dementia. Former models alleged that the couple would find attractive young men on the internet, promise them jobs, supply them with drugs and money, all in order to exploit them with the lawsuit brought against them, estimating that this happened to over a hundred young models. In a demented way, it’s impressive to have a company with both its owner and its CEO wrapped up in separate international sex trafficking rings.

Abercrombie and Fitch, which markets clothes to teens, has endured a number of scandals over the years, with many of these scandals relating to overtly sexual ads and wallpaper lining their stores, which many view as inappropriate given the teenage consumers they are marketing to. Perhaps the most egregious example of this kind of advertising was in the 2003 Christmas Field Guide (screenshots from the magazine which I will forewarn you that these contain nudity), an advertising campaign which had to be pulled from their stores after sparking controversy. One of the previously published A & F Quarterly’s, which I have found a free PDF scan of contains nude photography one would expect to find in a bisexual soft core porn magazine as opposed to a teenage clothing outlets catalogue. The issue features the exposed breasts of young women, the buttocks of both young men and women, and a photograph insinuating a ménage à trois happening in the backseat of a car.

One of the main photographers for Abercrombie and Fitch who shot the most overtly sexualized nude photography depicting people playing grab ass, was Bruce Weber. The New York Times reported sexual assault allegations against him by 15 separate male models. Peggy Siegel who joked about procuring boys and girls for Epstein sent a separate email to Epstein detailing the attendants of her birthday soiree, listing a man I presume to be the same Bruce Weber. Weber was mentioned by Epstein in an email with a redacted individual regarding modeling. Co-founder of NEXT Model Management Faith Kates would email Epstein about scheduling a modeling shoot for some young woman, with Kates mentioning that it had cost $100,00 to book Weber for a separate client in the past, but that she could find a photographer for Epstein for as little as $10,000. Someone listed as V. emails Epstein that she has an Abercrombie and Fitch campaign with Weber, but doesn’t have a visa and wants Epstein’s advice on the matter.

Abercrombie Kids made thong underwear for girls between 10–14, one of which said “wink wink” and another which said “eye candy” with some of the thongs depicting little cherries. The publication SFGATE referred to these as the “Lolita line of thongs”. The kids line also marketed padded bikini tops to girls ranging between the ages of 7 and 16.

Eye candy, indeed!

The Many Secrets of Victoria’s Secret, Naomi Campbell, and Elite Model Management

In my previous video, I discussed this key detail regarding Epstein, Wexner, and Victoria’s Secret, “Epstein and his mobbed-up lingerie peddling pal Les Wexner repurposed CIA planes used to traffic weapons in Iran-Contra to deliver bras and panties. Southern Air Transport, a CIA front company, had one of its planes shot down in Nicaragua, which was the thread that ultimately unraveled the Iran-Contra scandal when it was found that the plane was ferrying weapons both to Nicaragua and to Israel to be sold to Iran. But it wasn’t just guns they were running, but cocaine—and an airplane hangar in Miami, used by SAT, suspected of being used in the drug trafficking, was planned to be destroyed. SAT relocated its headquarters to Ohio, and some of the planes were moved to the Rickenbacker Air National Guard base in Ohio, with Epstein working as the point man in soliciting SAT to make the move. Ohio journalist Bob Fitrakis spoke to the former Franklin County Sheriff, who revealed that there was an ongoing investigation into drug trafficking out of Rickenbacker involving CIA planes. In 1996, an Alabama newspaper reported that an SAT plane in Ohio was found to have cocaine in it by customs agents, with SAT claiming it had nothing to do with the CIA and then promptly handing over the plane to an insurance company due to mercury contamination wink wink. One week before the CIA inspector general released his findings on Iran-Contra linking SAT planes to cocaine trafficking, the company would file for bankruptcy. SAT planes around the same time were also smuggling blood diamonds out of Angola despite a UN embargo prohibiting doing such a thing—so perhaps all of this explains what Epstein meant when he said he got rich off “arms, drugs, and diamonds.”.

Ed Razek, the former Chief Marketing Executive at L Brands, would run the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Shows, and was accused of inappropriate behavior towards models, including demeaning and sexual comments, asking them to sit on his lap, kissing them, and touching one’s crotch.

Naomi Campbell, who started her career in music videos for Bob Marley as well as appearing as a schoolgirl in Pink Floyd’s film The Wall, would ultimately have her career kick off when she began modeling for Victoria’s Secret. She was represented by Elite Model Management, whose founder, John Casablancas, was open about his preference for “child women”. One of Casablancas’ marriages would end after his affair with the at-the-time 16-year-old Stephanie Seymour. In 1993, he married Aline Wermelinger, aged 17, whom he had met as a schoolgirl at an Elite Contest in Rio de Janeiro.

Campbell would have a falling out with Casablancas, who said that she was crazy and irrational and that she had mistreated staff, with Campbell denying the allegations and saying that she had quit.

Campbell is a known associate of Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, having been on the Lolita Express five separate times, with one of these flights also being boarded by Bill Clinton.

Whitney Webb writes in the first part of her First Friends series writes, “Photos from the occasion where Campbell claims to have first met Epstein – her 31st birthday party hosted on Briatore’s yacht – show Campbell and Epstein associates in the same photograph. Those photographs are now rather infamous as they also show Epstein’s most prominent accuser, an underage Virginia Roberts (later Virginia Giuffre after her marriage), attending the party and following Epstein’s most notorious accomplice – Ghislaine Maxwell – around the event. Giuffre died earlier this year in April. There are other pictures of Campbell and Maxwell partying together in the early 2000s at subsequent events, suggesting the two became rather chummy after their initial meeting. Giuffre later alleged that Campbell and Maxwell had been “BFF,” i.e., best friends.”

Campbell said, “He [Epstein] was always front and center at Victoria’s Secret shows.”

Campbell formerly dated Sean “Diddy” Combs who is currently in prison for “transportation to engage in prostitution after suffering a publicity crisis due to a sex trafficking scandal.

Another one of Campbell’s romantic partners, Flavio Briatore, an Italian businessman who has been the focus of a recent investigative report written by Whitney Webb, has his name featured in Epstein’s black book which was originally produced by Epstein’s butler Alfredo Rodriguez. Rodriguez made notes in the book that he believed would be helpful to investigators. Briatore’s name is circled alongside others like Wexner, Trump, and Brunel. Briatore is also an associate of Donald Trump. Campbell claimed to have met Epstein during her 31st Birthday party, which was hosted on Briatore’s yacht. After the conclusion of Briatore and Campbell’s four-year relationship, Briatore would begin to date supermodel and Victoria’s Secret Angel Heidi Klum who is also in Epstein’s black book. Klum had both Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew attend her Halloween party. Donald Trump and Melania were present at the party. Maxwell claimed to have introduced Trump and Melania.

Campbell went on to date a Russian billionaire who began his career working for the Israeli-intelligence asset Marc Rich.

Campbell denied having knowledge of Epstein’s crime, but Epstein victim Viriginia Giuffre stated that Ghislaine and Campbell were “BFF” and that there was “no way in hell” Campbell was unaware of the abuse taking place.

Donald Trump judged and hosted the Look of the Year contest in both 1991 and 1992, an annual event organized by Elite that has been credited with launching the careers of Cindy Crawford and the formerly mentioned Stephanie Seymour. Contestants at these competitions were as young as 14. Both years’ parties took place aboard a large yacht called the Spirit of New York.

The 1991 party featuring 58 models was attended by then 45 year old Donald Trump. At this party men old enough to be the fathers and grandfathers of the aspiring models in attendance, as described in an article by the Guardian, gathered amongst the girls on the dance floor, pressing themselves against the girls.

The next year in 1992, the same yacht was chartered for an Elite party with Trump once again being in attendance. Shawna Lee, who was 14 years of age at the time of being a contestant, recalled girls being taken downstairs to dance before Trump, Casablancas, and others one by one. Another contestant who was 15 at the time of the party recalls a similar story of being paraded before the men on the yacht with one of the organizers telling her that if she refused to go downstairs, she would be excluded from the competition.

The Guardian would say after a six-month investigation into the Look of the Year contests, “The stories we have heard suggest that Casablancas, and some of the men in his orbit, used the contest to engage in sexual relationships with vulnerable young models. Some of these allegations amount to sexual harassment, abuse or exploitation of teenage girls; others are more accurately described as rape.”

While Trump himself would not be accused of such things by Look of the Years contestants, the Guardian goes on to point out that, “He [Trump] even married a former Look of the Year contestant: the current first lady, Melania Trump, narrowly missed out on a trip to New York in 1992, after coming second in the Slovenian heat.”

One model recalled seeing Trump present at the bar during Elite parties which was where the new models hung around. Four women recalled the agency making them attend dinners with Casablancas, Trump, and other men. One contestant said that Trump would find reasons to come backstage while girls were getting dressed. Naomi Campbell was also involved in some capacity with the 1991 Look of the Year contest.

It was reported in New York magazine that two female executives at Elite had pleaded with Casablancas and Gerald Marie, the head of Elite’s Paris office, to quit having sex with minors. And everything circles back to Epstein which we once again can read in the Guardian article, “It also appears that Epstein had a Casablancas connection during the 1990s. According to a lawsuit filed in the US three months ago, in 1990 Casablancas sent a teenage model for her first ‘casting call’ at a residential address on New York’s Upper East Side, to meet a ‘photographer’ who, it turned out, was Epstein. The lawsuit states that Epstein ordered the 15-year-old girl to undress before taking photographs of her, pushing her against a wall and sexually assaulting her.”

Much of the above information was published in an article on Unlimited Hangout entitled First Friends: How “Italy’s Donald Trump” Introduced Naomi Campbell to Epstein, the article reads, “Elite came under scrutiny a few years ago due to Donald Trump’s political fame, as his daughter Ivanka began modeling for Elite at age 15, wearing what the New York Times described at the time as ‘sexy outfits,’ including a ‘see-through white dress,’ while ‘still chubby in the cheeks with baby fat.’”

Former Elite model Nicole Junkermann appears on Epstein flight manifests riding on the Lolita express on three separate occasions, she can be seen all over Epstein’s emails, and she invested in Carbyne 911 along with Jeffery Epstein and Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund, and in addition to her funding of Carbyne, she would also sit on the Board of Directors alongside former Israeli Prime Minister and Epstein associate Ehud Barak and its Unit 8200 co-founders.

For more about Carbyne, refer to my previous video and article.

Former Elite Model Adriana Ross was accused of procuring underage girls for Epstein.

George Houraney founder of the American Dream Calendar Girl contests recalls organizing a party at Mar-a-Lago at the behest of Donald Trump in 1993 with Trump giving him a $30,000 budget for travel arrangements for Houraney and the girls, but once arriving to the party, after an hour had passed, he recalled there being only one other guest in attendance, that being Jeffery Epstein. He asked Trump where the other guests were. Our current President replied, “Well, this is it.” Houraney said he then realized, “this is a Jeff Epstein party, basically”.

After this Houraney and Trump would form a business partnership that ended in two separate lawsuits.

Trump’s foray into the world of pageants was by no means over. Trump would go on to acquire the Miss Universe Organization which consists of Miss Universe, Miss USA, and Teen Miss USA.

The second installment of the First Friend series, written by Whitney Webb and Mark Goodwin, details the modeling mogul Paolo Zampoli, who also has ties to Flavio Briatore and Donald Trump. Zampolli was the lead organizer of the Look of the Year contests put on by Elite Model Management and had a relationship with Casablancas. The Unlimited Hangout report quotes an Italian-language book entitled Gli Italiani which reads, “The models have to travel the world, they are not sedentary – he says, sipping champagne with his gaze always on his blackberry – we had an office in Brazil where we found them and then moved them continuously from Miami to Berlin, from Paris to Milan, always keeping about seventy of them in New York. For years, the business [i.e., ID models] has produced money and become well known in the world of VIPs – from Bill Clinton to the rulers of the Gulf up to Shimon Peres [Former Israeli Prime Minister] to Donald Trump […].”

Zampolli married his wife at 19, but when she was a minor, his future wife was on the Epstein Flight logs accompanied by Brunel. Zampolli and Brunel were friends. Fashion photographer Clayton Nelson claimed to have seen Zampolli and Brunel with Donald Trump “insistantly following a model”. Brunel for a time rented an apartment at Trump Tower. Zampolli had Melania Trump as one of his models for the Metropolitan Models agency. Currently, Zampolli is now in the Trump administration working as the Special Envoy for Global Partnerships

.

Zampolli has close ties to Epstein associate Brock Pierce, the former child actor turned cryptocurrency businessman. After leaving the child acting behind, Pierce at 16 became a partner in Digital Entertainment Network (DEN). In 2000, a lawsuit was filed against Pierce and DEN founder Marc-Collins Rector, alleging that they pressured the plaintiffs into taking drugs and having sex when they were teenagers. After an indictment was issued against them, they fled the country together until being arrested by Interpol. Guns and child pornography were found in the LA mansion that DEN operated out of. The company held parties for Hollywood’s gay A-listers where teenage boys were assaulted. Rector was alleged to have used not only drugs but also guns to coerce boys. Rector was eventually convicted of child enticement. For those who wish to learn more about DEN, it is the subject of the documentary film An Open Secret.

Epstein and Brunel’s Attempt to Create a Super-Agency

In the 2000’s, Epstein and Brunel would attempt to form a super modeling-agency with this proposed business venture tying together Epstein, Brunel, Elite Model Management co-founder Alain Kittler, and the previously mentioned sexual predator and Head of Elite’s Paris operation, Gerald Marie. Epstein often worked as the brains behind Brunel’s MC2 Model Management. In addition to his mentoring role, Epstein provided a $1,000,000 line of credit to Brunel when starting the agency. One lawsuit stated that MC2 was used to “recruit girls as young as 13”.

In January of 2006, email exchanges show an attempt by Brunel and Epstein to form a new company linked to MC2 with potential names being “e models”, “e management” and “e=mc²”. A memo from Alain Kittler addressed to Epstein discusses the business proposal in depth, which would have involved Elite Europe having a 15%-20% stake in the company. There is also mention in the memo of an insulting proposal of funds from a “Mr. Trump” with this likely being Eddie Trump, the owner of Elite during the time of the discussion. Gerald Marie was active in these discussions. The next month in February, Brunel mentions him and Epstein potentially meeting with both Gerald and Alain in Paris.

A separate email in May of 2006 shows Brunel’s interest in the ownership of Elite after hearing a rumour that Eddie Trump was selling the company, which he passed word of to Epstein. The following month, Epstein ,while discussing this new business venture with Brunel, mentions how Gerald will only be “there” (presumably at Elite’s Paris office) for a year and that this gives Brunel the opportunity to “take all the girls”. And it appears that had this company come to fruition, Epstein likely would have been the majority shareholder.

All of this is significant in that it shows how Epstein, Brunel, Marie, and Kittler were all in communication with three of these powerful men being known sexual predators. Epstein, Brunel, and Marie all used the modeling industry as a means of funneling girls to them and all have been accused of sex trafficking. Former model Carre Sutton alleged that Marie had trafficked her to “wealthy men around Europe”. Marie victim Jill Dodd alleged that she had been trafficked by Marie to arms dealer and Epstein associate Adnan Khashoggi who had paid Marie’s modeling agency Paris Planning up to $50,000 to be introduced to her. This is behavior that corresponds to the known crimes of Epstein and Brunel with Khashoggi serving as yet another tie shared in common by Epstein and Marie. Not only do these emails demonstrate the relationships shared by these men who used the modeling industry as a global scouting and recruiting pipeline for young women and teenage girls, but they also demonstrate the terrifying prospect of Marie’s girls being handed over to none other than Brunel and Epstein

.

Lingerie for Little Girls

Finally, let’s briefly address Limited TOO.

In an article entitled Lolita’s Closet, Emily Yoffe writes for Slate about taking her child shopping at the mall where they visited Limited Too, which markets to girls from the ages of 5-15, specifically focusing on the “tween” demographic. In the article, Yoffe writes, “Moving through the store, I wondered if insolence was preferable to suggestiveness. I reached my limit at what Limited Too sold to go under their clothing: a line of padded, underwire push-up bras for girls with nothing of their own to pad or push up.” She also describes underwear as too skimpy for children with rhinestone hearts and‘cheeky sayings’ like “Buy It Now! Tell Dad Later!”

DOJ documents show that it was Epstein’s financial trust company that was in control of TOO., Inc., the parent company of Limited TOO.

Lolita Lives On: Dolly in the Digital Age

The 1955 novel Lolita was promoted and distributed by the CIA in an effort to undermine the Soviet Union. Vladimir Nabokov’s cousin was the Secretary General for the CIA’s Congress for Cultural Freedom. The CCF through magazines like Encounter helped promote the novel. The possible inspiration for the characters of Humbert Humbert and the high-society pedophile Clare Quilty may have been a Stanford professor who is the man who coined the word “nymphet” (often attributed to Nabokov) who confessed to Nabokov that he participated in orgies with young girls and forced his wife to dress like a child.

What began as a literary exploration of pedophilic predation written in the first-person from the perspective of a narcissist with a penchant for intellectualizing his sick and twisted fantasies was repackaged by Hollywood into consumable fantasy. While Nabokov’s novel depicts the victimization of a child, Kubrick along with former Signal Corps photographer James B. Harris and military-trained photographer Bert Stern would turn the character of Lolita into a girl who is complicit in the seduction of adults. This is the Lolita archetype. The controversial movie was made possible by a production company with ties to organized crime whose third largest shareholder around the time of the film’s release was a foundation which worked as a financial agent for the CIA.

The Lolita archetype would later be commodified through men like Wexner and promulgated through companies like Limited Too and Victoria’s Secret with their PINK line of lingerie and apparel marketing to girls as young as 13. Men like Epstein and Gerald Marie used their prestige in the modeling world to syphon victims to themselves and to others while also building the cultural apparatus that could mass-produce them the ‘nymphets’ they sought to abuse.

The deaths of Epstein and Brunel, and Wexner’s retreat from the spotlight does not mean that the Lolita archetype has died. In fact, it has taken on a life of its own.

The nymphet has left the red carpet and entered the digital world.

The Epstein class no longer has to push the Lolita archetype. Like a virus it now propagates itself. The 2010s saw young girls posting about “nymphet fashion” to websites like Pinterest and Tumblr. Pictures of Sue Lyon in a cherry red bikini tilting her sunglasses in order to bestow the camera with a sultry glare, or photographs of Dominique Swain’s white sheer dress becoming translucent from a nearby sprinkler dangling an arched foot were posted to the websites as aspirational. Red lipstick, polka-dot dresses, knee high socks, pigtails, hair adorned in ribbons and bows, all of these signifiers of girlishness which had been fetishized through the films and broader pop culture became a look young women tried to imitate. Through Pinterest image boards, TikTok, and other social media outlets, the virus has begun to propagate itself. The Lolitafication is complete. The world has been reconfigured to the fetishized fantasies of Epstein and his circle.

Lolita lives on in the 3.1 million videos of TikTok’s coquette feed. She appears on OnlyFans, raking in millions of dollars within a day of young women turning 18, after the Humbert’s who have been waiting on literal countdown to 18 clocks shelling out money. Becoming the legal age is now just another opportunity for a product launch. Lolita saturates the largest porn sites with the widespread prevalence of step-parent pornography where older men reenact the exact impropriety of Humbert Humbert with their younger co-stars. One of the tenets of manosphere and red pill creators is that a woman’s “sexual market value” is dependent upon her youthfulness, with women becoming useless past a certain age, echoing the logic of Lolita’s pedophile narrator.

The hypersexualized visual vocabulary created by Kubrick, popularized by the mass-media, disseminated through televisions and the glossy covers of magazines, flaunted on billboards and lining the walls of department stores, the archetype exploited by Epstein and Wexner, now lives in the binary, staring into us as we stare at her through the screen.

The weaponization is complete.

She was Lo, plain Lo, on the silver screen, sauntering down red carpets at fourteen. She was Lola in magazines. She is Dolly in digital. She was Dolores on the dotted lines of our modeling contracts. But in our age she will always be Lolita.

Addendum: Much of the information spanning the modeling section of the article especially in regards to Naomi Campbell and

Casablancas draws heavily from Whitney Webb’s First Friends: How “Italy’s Donald Trump” Introduced Naomi Campbell to Jeffrey Epstein which I would encourage everyone to read. The piece delves into a lot of information further exposing the nexus between modeling, intelligence, and organized crime. The follow up article by Webb and Mark Goodwin First Friends: How the First Couple’s Consigliere Went From Modeling Mogul to Special Envoy I believe is also important reading in regards to this subject.

Subscribe now

Everything They Don't Want You to Know About Epstein in Under 18 Minutes (Click this Link for the YouTube Video)

Jeffery Edward Epstein was born to two Jewish parents in 1953 in the New York City borough of Brooklyn. He’d be described by classmates as nerdy, freckled, a little chubby, and good at math. He’d spend a year at the Interlochen Center for the Arts for his ability to wail on the bassoon and eventually graduated high school at the age of 16 after skipping a grade. He attended college at NYU, dropped out in 1974, went backpacking through Europe like a white girl trying to find herself, and then landed himself a gig as a teacher at the prestigious Dalton School despite lacking any credentials. The headmaster of the Dalton School just prior to Epstein’s arrival was Donald Barr, an intelligence spook who had been in the OSS—the precursor to the CIA. He was known to make odd hires, and he likely hired Epstein prior to his departure. Not long after leaving Dalton, Barr would write Space Relations, a sci-fi novel about a planet ruled by oligarchs who participate in child sex slavery. Donald Barr’s son Bill Barr was in the CIA and would go on to be the attorney general under both George H. W. Bush and Donald Trump, earning himself the nickname Cover-up General for his role in sweeping much of the Iran-Contra scandal under the rug. Bill Barr was the AG during Epstein’s “suicide.” At Dalton Epstein could be seen galivanting around in fur coats, gold chains, and open shirts exposing his chest, which, to be fair, is proper pimp attire. Former Dalton students say that Epstein could be seen in the halls trying to rizz up girls and was once seen at a high school party where alcohol was present.

In 1976, after getting the boot from Dalton, Epstein, despite lacking credentials, quickly got a job at Bear Stearns, rising up the ranks under the tutelage of Alan Greenberg, whose kids Epstein reportedly tutored at Dalton. Greenberg was a friend of Trump’s mentor Roy Cohn, who helped run a pedo-blackmail ring. In 1980, Epstein would become Cosmopolitan’s bachelor of the month and, more importantly, a limited partner at Bear Stearns after only four years. Much of what Epstein did was advise the wealthy on how to evade paying taxes. Epstein would leave Bear Stearns the day after a tender offer was placed that would become the cause of an insider trading scandal, but the SEC interview with him didn’t land him behind bars because Jeffy boy is non-stick like Teflon. In 1981, Epstein formed International Assets Group, claiming to be a bounty hunter who retrieved stolen money for the wealthy and governments. Around this time period he also claimed to be in the CIA, had a phony Austrian passport, and befriended alleged arms dealer Douglas Leese and the infamously known arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi, the latter of which would bring him into the orbit of the Iran-Contra network.

What’s Iran-Contra? The US wanted to fund both sides of the war between Iran and Iraq to weaken them and strengthen Israel. The US, in order to bypass an embargo on Iran, had Israel sell US weapons to Iran and then used the money from the arms sales to fund anti-communist rebels in Nicaragua, with additional money for the Contras coming from everyone’s friends in the CIA helping make sure that some of that sweet, sweet Nicaraguan booger sugar made its way onto American streets. So Khashoggi becomes a client of Jeffery Epstein, and Khashoggi is an arms dealer wrapped up with Iran-Contra. Also, around this time Epstein rents a penthouse in New York with Stanley Pottinger, a lawyer who helped the Iranians circumvent the embargo through shell companies and phony invoices under the CIA’s supervision. Former Israeli intelligence operative Ari-Ben Menashe, who was involved in Iran-Contra, said he met Epstein in the mid-eighties through Robert Maxwell, with Maxwell, of course, being involved in Iran-Contra as well. Epstein’s bff, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, was the head of Israeli military intelligence during the planning phase of Iran-Contra.

In 1987, Epstein was hired as a consultant for the debt collection agency Towers Financial, where he helped Steve Hoffenberg run what at the time was the largest Ponzi scheme in American history. Epstein would avoid all criminal charges despite his intimate involvement, which the same can’t be said of poor Steve. According to Hoffenberg, Epstein, on his way out from Towers Financial, made off with $100 million of loot that he stored in offshore accounts while talking to prosecutors and scapegoating Hoffenberg for both their crimes.

During the time period he was swindling people out of money with Hoffenberg, Epstein would create J. Epstein and Co., claiming to only manage the wealth of billionaires, which may be flexing or may be fibbing, but he did become the chief financial adviser of billionaire Les Wexner, who owned The Limited, which touted companies like Bath and Body Works, Abercrombie and Fitch, and Victoria’s Secret under its belt. In 1991, Wexner would give Epstein power of attorney over his more than a billion dollars, which is totally normal, and you shouldn’t have any questions. 1991 was also the same time Columbus detectives were investigating the gangland-style assassination of Wexner’s lawyer, Arthur Shapiro. A police analyst submitted a memo saying Wexner was connected to organized crime, and despite the memo being ordered to be destroyed, journalist Bob Fritrakis would get his hands on a copy.

Epstein and his mobbed-up lingerie-peddling pal Les Wexner repurposed CIA planes used to traffic weapons in Iran-Contra to deliver bras and panties. Southern Air Transport, a CIA front company, had one of its planes shot down in Nicaragua, which was the thread that ultimately unraveled the Iran-Contra scandal when it was found that the plane was ferrying weapons both to Nicaragua and to Israel to be sold to Iran. But it wasn’t just guns they were running, but cocaine—and an airplane hangar in Miami used by SAT, suspected of being used in the drug trafficking, was planned to be destroyed. SAT relocated their headquarters to Ohio, and some of the planes were moved to the Rickenbacker Air National Guard base in Ohio, with Epstein working as the point man in soliciting SAT to make the move. Ohio journalist Bob Fritrakis spoke to the former Franklin County Sheriff, who revealed that there was an ongoing investigation into drug trafficking out of Rickenbacker involving CIA planes. In 1996, an Alabama newspaper reported that an SAT plane in Ohio was found to have cocaine in it by customs agents, with SAT claiming it had nothing to do with the CIA and then promptly handing over the plane to an insurance company due to mercury contamination wink wink. One week before the CIA inspector general released his findings on Iran-Contra linking SAT planes to cocaine trafficking, the company filed for bankruptcy. SAT planes around the same time were also smuggling blood diamonds out of Angola despite a UN embargo prohibiting doing such a thing—so perhaps all of this explains what Epstein meant when he said he got rich off “arms, drugs, and diamonds.”

In 1990, Epstein got his Palm Beach crib, and The Limited transferred ownership of a Boeing 727 to Epstein, which you probably know as the Lolita Express. The following year Epstein’s buddy Wexner and Ronald Lauder, the sole heir of the Estee Lauder fortune, form the Mega Group, which is dedicated to spreading Jewish causes, and Robert Maxwell is found dead off his yacht, the Lady Ghislaine, after falling, or having a heart attack, or deciding to swim, or getting whacked by the Mossad because a book came out revealing his work for the agency the month prior and his businesses were floundering with shares being sold off by Goldman Sachs due to the ludicrous loans he couldn’t pay off, and maybe he did or didn’t try to get the agency he did so much for to help him out of the pinch.

Next year, 1992, Epstein and Ghislaine start going out. In 1993, Epstein bought Zorro Ranch. In 1996, Epstein became an island boy after purchasing some real estate from the Virgin Islands, which is great for tax purposes, and he renamed it J. Epstein and Co. Financial Trust Company. It’s around this time a couple accusations of sexual improprieties are leveled against Epstein, but he just keeps getting away with them. In 1999, the most famous Epstein accuser, Virginia Giuffre, met Ghislaine at Mar-a-Lago. Giuffre would later accuse some notable people such as Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, and New Mexico governor Bill Richardson of being men Epstein trafficked her to.

In 2005, a woman called Palm Beach police to report that her 14-year-old stepdaughter had been given money to undress and massage Epstein, and an investigation was opened, leading to 35 more victims being identified. In 2006, Epstein is arrested, released on a $3,000 bond, and a federal investigation begins. In 2007, he is brought to court, and US attorney Alexander Acosta agrees to a plea deal, which Alan Dershowitz helped finagle for Epstein, which protects his four known and all unknown conspirators from all federal criminal charges, and despite federal law, Acosta agrees for this deal to be kept from victims. According to one account, Acosta said that he was told that Epstein belonged to intelligence and to leave it alone. Epstein is sentenced to 18 months in a minimum security prison, serves only 13 months, and is allowed to leave for 12 hours a day to “work.” Epstein has a variety of legal problems over the next few years due to multiple civil lawsuits brought against him by his victims. In 2019, he is arrested again on one count of trafficking minors and one count of conspiracy to traffic minors, and a month later he is found dead in his Manhattan jail cell of suicide after apparently being taken off suicide watch, having his cellmate transferred, the guards falling asleep, and video cameras malfunctioning. France opened an investigation into the Epstein network the same month as the suicide, which resulted in the arrest of Epstein associate Jean Luc Brunel, who was also found dead in his jail cell. Ghislaine Maxwell is arrested and later sentenced to 20 years for acquiring underage girls for Epstein to abuse.

So we know Epstein was a jet-setting multimillionaire with connections to former prime ministers and US presidents like Bill Clinton and Donald Trump who with the help of his madame sexually abused and trafficked under age girls for the rich and powerful. He also had ties to intelligence; some of his victims accused him of recording videos of people abusing minors for the purpose of blackmail. The FBI found CDs, videos, and tapes, some labelled (young)-name, depicting girls who seemed to be minors, but the always trustworthy FBI swears that none of these videos showed girls being abused by Epstein or others. Now let’s answer what might be the most important question regarding Epstein with additional information from the newly released files.

Who was Epstein working for? Was he a free agent? Russian intelligence, CIA, or something else? Well, let’s put on our thinking caps.

He dated the daughter of Israeli super spy Robert Maxwell, who, in addition to the Iran-Contra dealings Ari Ben Menashe said he was a part of, would also sell bugged PROMIS software, which had a backdoor placed into it by Israeli intelligence, to various governments across the globe, including the US, with it being installed in sensitive areas like Sandia National Laboratory, which is at the center of America’s nuclear weapons system. Ghislaine Maxwell’s sisters Christine and Isabel worked for the Israeli intelligence front company that their father sold the bugged PROMIS software for. Both of them would go on to have various different business ventures in the tech world, often working with Israeli and sometimes US intelligence. One of the people Epstein most frequently communicated with in the files is former Israeli Prime Minister and former head of Israeli military intelligence Ehud Barak. Epstein, at the behest of Barak, would let a senior Israeli military intelligence official stay at his Manhattan apartment for weeks at a time—this is the same apartment that the Israeli government furnished with a security system. Epstein and Barak helped build an Israeli police state in the country of Côte d’Ivoire; Epstein helped broker a security cooperation agreement between Israel and Mongolia; he’d sell Israeli cybersecurity to the United Arab Emirates; he helped Alan Dershowitz, who never took his pants off during massages, to smear John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, the authors of a book critical of the Israel Lobby; and he had a close friendship with Ariane de Rothschild (yes, those Rothschilds), which he then used their friendship to obtain funds for Israeli cyberweapons. Epstein appears to have helped JP Morgan bankers secure a meeting with Netanyahu, which would mean that Epstein’s reach in Israeli politics crossed the left-right divide; he helped foster a relationship between the Israelis and India; he helped run Les Wexner’s Zionist philanthropy endeavors; and he helped build a back channel to Russia for Israel during the Syrian Civil War.

After Ehud Barak left Israeli leadership, Epstein would help him enter the world of surveillance tech by connecting Barak to Peter Thiel, the evil mastermind of Palantir, whom Epstein had a relationship with, including Epstein donating $40 million to the Thiel-co-founded Valor Ventures. Epstein would help bring Thiel in on the incredible business venture that is Carbyne 911, which makes advanced emergency service communications tech, meaning that when you call 9-1-1 Epstein’s Israeli buddies may be getting all kinds of data from your phone. The company was founded by Ehud Barak and former Unit 8200 members, an Israeli intelligence service that specializes in signal intelligence, counterintelligence, and cyberwarfare. In addition to Thiel, Epstein’s other buddy Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, you know, the “I love the torture video” dude, likely invested in Carbyne. Epstein would donate to groups like Friends of the Israeli Defense Forces and the Jewish fund. He would mock goyim with his Jewish friends, which lends credence to victim Maria Farmer, who spoke of Epstein and his circle having blatantly racist Jewish supremacist views. Epstein told Thiel he represented the Rothschilds, the family who helped create the modern-day state of Israel. So maybe it’s not too crazy that we learn from the files that one confidential human source would tell his FBI handler he believed Epstein to be an Israeli spy. Now some people will try to say that there is no smoking gun, but the assets of intelligence agencies don’t usually receive checks with MOSSAD written in bold letters that they show everybody or go on televised press tours telling everyone about their top-secret work, so I’m not sure what would constitute a smoking gun.

Now, for the sake of time, we will skip to the massive release of more than 3 million files beginning in 2025 after the passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which took place after Trump and his administration said they would release the files; they wouldn’t release the files; there are no files; or there are files, but they’re a Democrat hoax. And since I’m running out of time, like any good conspiratorial rant, it’s about to be a shotgun blast of revelations from the files of things seemingly too outlandish to be true.

Epstein and limited hangout Noam Chomsky and the boys with Chomsky’s wife were calling Jeffy their best friend. Epstein was also close to drunken slob, Trump advisor, and propagandist Steve Bannon. Another close friend of Epstein was Woody Allen, and Epstein’s assistant was Woody’s former secret teen lover. Allen and Epstein would joke in an email about a pedophile convention in France. Musk would ask Epstein when the craziest party on the island would be at 12:30 am on Christmas day. Elon’s brother Kimbal is warned in an email not to harm Jeffery’s girl Jennifer. Epstein Skype called some guy named Torture. There are talks in the files of genetically engineering pigs for kosher bacon. Bill Gates’s adviser Boris Nikolic connected Epstein to the founder of 4chan, with the two hitting it off sometime between October 20th and 24th of 2011. The politically incorrect imageboard notorious for its wignat Nazi discussions and trolling was launched on the 23rd. Bill Gates may have caught the clap from some Russian girls Epstein hooked him up with before surreptitiously dosing Melinda with drugs to fight off whatever Gates may have contracted. Epstein would help fund the takeover of Bitcoin to make it less based and more blue pilled. Jeffy was making payments to the Ohio State head of gynecology. Someone asked Epstein which gynecologist he sends his victims to. (Misspoke in the video and said this backwards.) UCLA neurology professor Mark Tramo emailed the convicted minor abuser Epstein that if you play the sound of a mother’s voice, babies will suck harder on pacifiers. On the day a child sex trafficking investigation was launched by the FBI into Epstein, he ordered 6 55-gallon drums of sulfuric acid, but maybe he just developed a sudden interest in fertilizer production or metal processing.

There’s also Epstein’s interest in the genetic editing and cloning of babies; him discussing pandemic simulations with Bill Gates through intermediaries in 2017; pseudo-intellectual guru Deepak Chopra saying, “God is a construct; cute girls are real”; and someone who claimed to be a former employee at Zorro Ranch asking a radio show host for one bitcoin in exchange for videos of Epstein having sex with minors as well as the location of two foreign girls supposedly buried in the New Mexico hills after dying during “rough, fetish sex.” There’s an email sent between redacted people claiming someone said on record that Epstein offered her money to birth a baby for black market use. Then there’s the journal of an Epstein victim with a poem seeming to hint at black market babies, which reads, “So sorry, Jeffrey, these things happen when your body has never been given time to properly heal!” So it came out in the toilet, and I didn’t know what to do, so I just flushed the tiny little fetus. You have made me numb, and I hate you for this! I hope I never have to see you again! I am not your personal incubator! Where is the baby? Where is Ghislaine?

And a separate poem with a redacted photo of a sonogram on the page from potentially the same victim or maybe someone else, which reads, “I heard the heartbeat even when she put her hands over my ears.” Aren’t pictures enough for them? Torture! Should I... deeply miss them? Have these all been...? [MURDERS]? Does this make me a [KILLER]?

Or there’s the email where a redacted individual says, “You offered to buy my baby six months into our relationship…”

None of this should be too surprising since Epstein has long been known to have an interest in eugenics and transhumanism and reportedly told people in his orbit that he wanted to seed the world with his DNA.

Or what about how Epstein used the word “whoops” more than 400 times, with some of those times being in response to hearing about the news of RFK Jr.’s second wife’s alleged suicide, or after a redacted person gave Epstein “permission to kill,” or after being told about the alleged rape of a young woman?

Then there’s Peggy Siegal, who, while on a visit in Kenya, emailed Epstein, “Bring a little baby back for you…or two. Boys or girls?

One of the most bizarre things is the 911 mentions of pizza often combined with the word “grape soda” in contexts that make no sense because if you know anything about billionaires, they are obsessed with pizza, grape soda, and jerky, and none of this could be coded language in any way. Take for instance this email exchange with the subject line “Pizza Monster,” which starts with an image sent to Epstein, with Epstein replying, “She looks pregnant,” to which the sender of the image then responds, “You mean radiating a soft glow with the look of bliss and excitement? Yeah, that’s the pizza.” Oh, and don’t think too hard about how Epstein was crazed for jerky and this email sent by a man named Francis Derby, who was the chef of a New York restaurant named the Cannibal, reads, “Just wanted to touch base about Jerky. JE said he was going to start eating regular food again, so he might be eating less jerky. That said, he has 6 bags of it in the downstairs freezer for his next trip. I believe it should be enough to get him through. If you have any other questions, please let me know.”

Or this email sent to Epstein: “This is better than a Chinese cookie. See attached. Let’s go for pizza and grape soda again. No one can understand.”

Or there’s the founder of an adoption charity who asked Epstein if he needed any new stakes on the island.

While much more could be said about all of these individual aspects of the Epstein scandal, with many other aspects of the case not being touched upon due to time constraints, maybe we can end this video with some of the…let’s say oddities around Epstein’s death, such as the DOJ drafting the announcement of his death the day prior to him, well, dying. Perhaps it was misdated, but this is only one of many oddities. Someone appears to enter his jail tier the night of his death, according to a video log released in the files. Epstein’s cellmate Nicholas Tartaglione, a police officer turned cocaine and steroid trafficker who murdered four people, tried to kill Epstein, according to Jeffery, after he was found by a guard semi-conscious with injuries on his neck, but there’s nothing to think about because Nicholas was removed from Epstein’s cell the night prior to the supposed suicide. And you also shouldn’t think too hard about how sheets and linens were used to create a decoy body and wheeled into a white van to thwart onlooking media while a black van drove off, supposedly with Epstein in it. Oh, and someone changed Epstein’s Apple ID password the day after he was dead. And it’s been reported a FedEx account linked to Epstein was used after he was dead. Now I don’t really believe that Epstein is alive somewhere kicking it back with a piña colada on the beach somewhere having a good old laugh, but given the absolute absurdity of the Epstein saga, who knows? All I know is that I don’t believe the insufferable retards Kash Patel and Dan Bongino.